Page 34

A personal realization about programming Indigenous work

2015-05-14 16.14.14
From left in foreground: Herbie Barnes and Tara Beagan Repast Design Andy Moro

Three years ago I took the helm of the English Theatre at the NAC. To say it’s been a steep learning curve is a laughable understatement. The learning is not just about how to run a large company or about the depth and breadth of theatre in Canada. It is about learning what the Canadian Story is, and how we are choosing to tell it.

I inherited the job from Peter Hinton. Peter did a huge job to ensure a presence on that national stage of Indigenous artists. Back then, I told Peter I was committed to continuing what he had started and ensuring that there was always an Indigenous presence in the programming. It seemed like a righteous thing to do – First Nations artists have seen oppression, they have seen racism, they get pigeonholed, and it is generally recognized that it’s hard for any persons who are not considered Caucasian to get roles in classical works. I could see all that. I was going to follow Peter’s path and help by offering opportunities to Indigenous artists.

It wasn’t a problem to do it practically. Many Indigenous artists are at the top of their craft and I would have asked them into the ensemble, or put shows like huff in the season, whether I had made that commitment or not. But that doesn’t mean I knew what I was talking about. My desire to make that commitment was steeped in being correct. Not steeped in an understanding of WHY we needed to do it. My understanding of Canada was not clear enough to know that I wasn’t doing a righteous thing to have Indigenous work in the season, but an absolutely essential thing.

The first thing I said to Sarah Stanley who joined me as Associate Artistic Director at the NAC was that I felt absolutely unqualified to carry through on that torch-relay from Peter. I knew nothing really about Indigenous storytelling. I knew about some good actors, but I only knew about three playwrights who were telling Indigenous stories. I asked Sarah to put together an intensive study of the canon of First Nations, Inuit and Metis work in Canada. We would celebrate the work and other artistic directors could come and we would all learn from it and extend that righteous programming across the country. If my learning curve coming to the NAC was a steep, attending The Study of the body of Indigenous work in Canada for two weeks on Manitoulin Island was a full 90 degrees.

I learned and learned and learned and learned and changed. I am actually changed by it. I can’t say that very often but I’m sitting here weeping while I’m writing these words, so it must be true. I only cry when I am being changed these days, just like a dunch arsed youngster.

I heard play after play about the current outrage of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls, play after play about residential schools, play after play about abducted Indigenous children who were taken from their families and put in foster care. Parents who have a hard time parenting because they themselves were stolen and never learned parenting. It hurt my soul to hear it. Shameful things have happened in our country. Harper himself read the apology for it. We cannot deny that it happened. And yet, I looked on the CBC website while I was there and there were two more Indigenous young women missing and the results of the inquest about the death of a First Nations teen who had been in care of the government.

The comments section were full of people saying that it’s a “Native problem;” that “alcoholism is something to fix in their own society;” and the most hurtful of all, “another proof that the Natives don’t love their children.” The next day I came back to the play readings and heard story after story of decades and decades of government workers, priests and nuns taking children. Institutions abducting them, beating them, sexually abusing them. Taking their language, culture and religion. Desperate parents chasing a car full of their own kids down barren roadways.

I had heard this history, but until I heard the stories and was moved by those stories, I did not know the history.

2015-05-15 11.52.25
Margo Kane reading from Moonlodge. Repast design Andy Moro

I’ve never had the power to physically punch out. I dropped out of debating club because I got called Olive Oyl at a tournament. I wish I was a fighter but I’m not. But we, you and I in the theatre, in TV and in film – WE have the power to teach. We have the power to reach people.

These are not all sad plays. The darker ones resonate with resilience more than tragedy. Most of them are funny. Some of them are really really funny. I had a long talk with a playwright I admire who insisted that none of his plays dealt with that dark history, that his were comedies celebrating First Nations humour. And he’s right. They are funny. But reflecting on his work, he can’t avoid the circumstance of what his characters have seen. Their history. Our history.

I blindly accepted Peter Hinton’s lead in programming Indigenous work because I believed it was righteous. But if I am going to tell Canada’s story through the theatre, this is the longest, most dramatic episode in our history. And we are still in it. I’m not doing anyone a favour by telling it. I have been granted the privilege to know about a community of artists who can bring that incredible, important story of our history and aspect of our society to our audiences. And our audiences need to hear that story, not just the history but the stories, so that together, we can move forward.

After recognizing that artistic directors often say that they would like to program Indigenous work but don’t know how or don’t know what the plays are, the Indigenous Performing Arts Alliance (IPAA) created a list of close to 400 plays by Indigenous writers. There is also a new First Nations Talent Bank for those wishing to engage an actor who can bring an Indigenous perspective to the work you are doing. The SpiderWebMap in tandem with theatrewiki.ca encourages Indigenous artists to locate themselves and their stories on the map. In fact I encourage all theatre makers to locate themselves there.

Indigenous artists are not so small in number and together we have the power to bring a fuller story of Canada to our stages.

Thanks

Jill

#CdnCult Times; Volume 5, Edition 3

Welcome to the #StudyRepast Edition. In brief, from May 5-16 Debajehmujig Storytellers, IPAA and NAC English Theatre, collaborated on a project dedicated to exploring and celebrating the Indigenous Body of Work. Salient among the many emerging themes were: the weight, import and brilliance of the stories, and what it means to open a door and to keep it open. I co-edited this issue with Editor-In Chief Michael Wheeler. He asked me to write this note because I had a clear idea for this edition and because I was there. Michael and I co-created SpiderWebShow to be able to respond quickly and forcefully to the events that shape our performance ecology and we want #CdnCult to act as the digital record of these times.

I want our country to understand itself. Theatre and Live Art are the tools our #CdnCult readership collectively employ. A literary manager brings to the attention of the artistic director and producer the plays that want to be produced. Thinking about this nationally, I encourage all of us to think like literary managers, and for the well being of our shared futures to advocate for the stories that -first and foremost – underpin who we are. To say what happens on the Rez stays on the Rez is like trying to run in quick sand. You can do it, for awhile, but eventually you just might drown. We need to learn how to run on this land, we need the full knowledge to know how this land works, we need the whole body and we need to own up to the full story. New stories are great, but as storytellers, we need to know our past before we can tell fully realized stories about our collective futures.

Each of the contributors speak to these ideas. Each speaks personally, but they are able do so because each of their companies were part of this historic collaboration. Jillian Keiley comes to a personal revelation regarding our need for story, Joseph Osawabine’s gives voice to the hard core realities of maintaining an Indigenous life in a country that does not uphold Indigenous values and Cole Alvis walks us through The #StudyRepast and leaves us with a personal recommitment to surveying who is and is not at “the table”.

Click here for more information about the whole cycle that includes The Summit at Banff in April 2014 and the #StudyRepast at Debajehmujig Storytellers on Manitoulin Island in May 2015.

Sarah Garton Stanley
SpiderWebShow Artistic Director
Co-Curator Summit/Study/Repast

Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu

ii-2

Pièce : Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu || Dramaturge : Réjean Ducharme
Lieu : Pointe St Charles || Modèles : Michelle Creeley, Phil Malizia

INAT TENDU : Liberté!… Liberté chérie ! moi penser assez vite pour voir en même temps tout ce que tu me redonnes ! Me revoici, tout d’un coup repeuplé ! Les fossés et les ponts, les forêts et les villes se sont remis à me loger ! Liberté, mon amour, mon chou, debout !

L’oeuvre dramatique Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu de Réjean Ducharme a été éditée à l’occasion de sa présentation au Théâtre de Gésu en 1976 par la Nouvelle Compagnie Théâtrale.

What Exactly is a Shared Platform?

brainstorm photo
We held an Open Source Brainstorm in the Theatre Centre Incubator as part of developing a plan for STAF’s new Shared Platform.

Eight months ago I took over as Executive Director and Transformation Designer of Small Theatre Administrative Facility (STAF). From that moment, I have been swept up in a conversation about ‘Shared Platforms’, a term at the centre of discussions on how to evolve our cultural infrastructure. Shared platform is also just a descriptor that can refer to many different models, which I think is leading to some confusion as people think about the possibilities they present.

STAF is a shared platform and is a good place to start this conversation as it is transitioning from one type of shared platform to a new one. In the old model (started just weeks after The Blue Jays first won the World Series in 1992) STAF was a shared platform for subsidized administrative services. The model allowed a number of artists and companies to share a grant writer, publicist, financial administrator, or general manager, thus reducing the administrative cost to those artists.

I am not a fan on this type of shared platform, as is probably obvious from my job title. Although it was once a very good idea, times have changed and as a community we must adapt to the given circumstances.  We will announce in early June some of the specifics of the different type of shared platform STAF is creating. These measures will give artists greater agency to follow the advice Mike Daisey tweeted to artists while in Toronto to, “own the means of production. Always.”

This means a shared platform that gives artists many more chances to do this type of work for themselves, and fewer chances to pay someone to do it for them. The word ‘entrepreneurial’ is often applied to this type of shared platform, but we will also have programs that seek a living wage. If nothing else, it is a healthier model that allows the ideals of Marx and Adam Smith to co-exist.

These are not the only types of shared platforms, and another kind has been discussed at length and is getting significant attention from funders: This week TAC, OAC, Trillium and Metcalf put out a call for “expressions of interest” regarding “shared charitable platform work”. This is the culmination of significant research and discussion around the how to deal with the infrastructure and requirements for emerging and newer artists as the RFEOI states:

“Many now question the feasibility of requiring artists to incorporate as stand-alone organizations in order to receive public and private funding, and seek alternative models to sustain their practice. One of the alternatives that has been proposed to address this challenge is shared charitable platforms.”

It also cites from the Metcalf-funded paper by Jane Marsland “Shared Platforms and Charitable Venture Organizations (2013)”, which was when I first became aware of shared platforms as a solution to barriers that many independent organizations face:

  1. It takes considerable work and expense to incorporate and set up a not-for-profit corporation with a Board of Directors.
  2. That Board of Directors can fire you from your job running the theatre company you started.
  3. The ability to give out tax receipts and receive funding from foundations requires a second more onerous level of administration along with being a not-for-profit corporation to maintain charitable status.
  4. With limited opportunities and many emerging artists, there is a trend of new and emerging artists spending their energy (in between bartending and commercial auditions) to set up this bulky infrastructure in order to have the means to pursue their craft.
  5. Registered charities have strict rules on their ability to engage in political advocacy. Recently we have seen with many environmental groups targeted by CRA regarding this aspect of the law.

*This is something we have talked about more at Praxis Theatre than something I have seen discussed in cultural industry studies or literature.

Marsland’s study, which acknowledges significant input on the nature of Canadian tax law from the David Stevens and Margaret Mason paper, “Tides Canada Initiatives Society: Charitable Venture Organizations: A New Infrastructure Model for Canadian Registered Charities“, outlines three possible umbrella models that could serve to lessen the need for emerging and new artists to go this route.

  • A) Establish a Charitable Venture Organization specifically for arts organizations.
  • B) Utilize existing administrative platforms such as arts service organizations or arts management providers.
  • C) Existing arts organizations, in collaborative relationships, acting as shared platforms.

A primary takeaway here from the report is:

“A charity must be able to show that in fact, at all times, it is carrying out only its own activities through the intermediary, and that it directs and controls the use of any resources that further these activities.”

The only reasonable conclusion I can reach from this is Option A: Charitable Venture Organization (CVO) is the type of shared platform that would best meet the standards established by Revenue Canada. Marsland lists several core characteristics of a CVO:

  • Project belongs to the CVO — the CVO takes the project in-house and it is not a separate legal entity
  • CVO is liable for everything
  • Project personnel are employees of the CVO
  • Contributions belong to the CVO — CVO reports revenue, expenses

Basically by ‘owning’ the project and being responsible for the finances, a CVO could provide charitable status for a number of projects and artists who no longer have to set up companies and boards and annual audited statements. Sounds like a good idea in principle, which is why there is now real talk about putting money behind setting one up. STAF Board President Julie Tepperman and her company Convergence Theatre is listed as a case study in the report where she notes:

“We certainly do not want a board who can hire and fire us. Nor do we want the headache of all the extra reporting and accounting. We do not want to have to pay $3,000 a year, which we don’t have, to do our taxes. We have enough headaches and accountability doing our taxes as a “shared partnership” thank you very much! The last thing we want or need is to turn Convergence Theatre into a child who will always need nurturing and care.”

FullSizeRender-2
The RIser Project was front page news in METRO yesterday.

Of course these aren’t the only shared platform models out there. Why Not Theatre has also created a shared platform for The Riser Project , which brings mid-sized theatre organizations into the creative process with emerging artists as their works are created and presented, providing artistic and producing opportunities these companies could only achieve collectively. The Metcalf Foundation and Toronto Arts Foundation recently committed to funding a two-year research and evaluation study of Why Not’s shared platform as well as STAF’s new model by S.L. Helwig & Associates President and Principal Consultant Sherri Helwig.

The hope is this will provide feedback to the community and to funders about how these particular shared platforms worked and where they can be improved. If there is consensus on anything about Shared Platforms, it is that there are many different models and that we need to be rigorous in our assessment of best practices while maintaining willingness for disparate models to co-exist.

Theatre by the Numbers

222695480_726bebd8f5_o
Photo by Darren Barefoot via Creative Commons 2.0

This year, the Professional Association of Canadian Theatres (PACT) undertook a big push for a celebration of World Theatre Day (March 27), with a Canadian message co-commissioned with Playwrights Guild of Canada and the Association des théâtres francophones du Canada – ATFC from theatre artist Mieko Ouchi. As the new Executive Director of PACT, I am heavily committed to the sharing of my passion for theatre with the general public and was so excited to have World Theatre Day Canada trend in social media!

Extra thrilling to me was that StatsCanada produced a Theatre by the Numbers piece about theatre in Canada – I even called to thank them. (Interestingly enough, the numbers included sales of cosmetics and wigs as relevant data). Hill Strategies recently promoted this information as part of an overall Arts Research Monitor, together with the data garnered as part of a PACT commissioned survey by Nanos Research last spring and Jane Marsland’s very interesting Changing Landscape for Theatres.

Certainly, in advocating for the significance of the arts in Canada, numbers are often the thing – from numbers of attendees to the Canadian cultural spend or the GDP of the performing arts in Canada. (See Simon Brault’s blog “Art if a Serious Business”) But with these numbers, what do we actually know about Canadian theatre? Finding comprehensive and statistically valid data (please, contain your excitement) is almost impossible. The StatsCan information comes from formal reporting in HST, CRA payroll remittances and charitable information returns – but what about the information that is captured elsewhere, in CADAC for companies receiving operating funding from the granting agencies that use the financial and statistical reporting web application?

But, CADAC is self-entered and with the exception of the financials – which must match audit data – prone to inconsistency, over-aggregation and some (perhaps) inflation by the organizations who use it. And there are many theatre companies, on project grants or outside the incorporated/charitable paradigm, who are not represented at all. Fringe anyone?

When I moved to PACT as the new Executive Director last September, I wanted to know who, if anyone, knew how many professional theatre companies there were in Canada? I mean, Anglophone, Francophone, Aboriginal, diverse, large, tiny, venue-based, fringe-based, and informal collectives. And do you know, no one knows. There are 295 who receive operating funding identified in CADAC. PACT certainly collects information about around 400 or so in its Theatre Listing, but keeping it up to date is constant work and every six months a new revision is essential. I called Jane Marsland to see if she had any ideas about it. She agreed; no one has the big picture.

Every year, hundreds of theatre productions happen across Canada, mounted by PACT member and other professional companies, touring productions, Fringe shows, independent productions in store front theatres and pop-up venues. (I can’t even begin to conceive of the number of community and amateur performances.) So there must be thousands of individual performances. And, given the limitations of our data collection and the underfunded nature of the sector, we simply lose the information. Whole seasons of theatre are lost (unless you are a company that can afford to keep archive pages on your website), except for random hits in Google searches. For me it is heartbreaking.

True, one of the exciting things about live theatre as an art form is its very ephemeral nature. Miss that show and the one the next night will be different again, miss the production and you may regret it – many Canadian shows that are worth a second or third run or a national tour simply disappear. I truly regret having a headache and missing not being able to make Vitals by Rosamund Small in 2014. I had read the script and was really excited. But a migraine… wait, I have gotten off topic….

What would we do with valid data about Canadian theatre? We certainly use what we have in advocacy work – explaining to elected officials and senior public servants that indeed, Canadians go to theatre, and spend so much, and volunteer so much, and stable funding can extend not only the intrinsic value of the work but also the economic benefits. But wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could say, on this night in 2014 there were so many performances with potential audiences of this many thousands of people (I think capturing actual attendance would be unfeasible but we could count seats). That there were this many plays by this many playwrights, how many were women, how many artists of colour…oh, the things we could learn!

What to do with it? More effective government advocacy certainly. But what about quarterly or monthly press releases celebrating the number or an online searchable database of productions – statistical information could go out to international media (why keep that kind of information to ourselves?), generating attention for the volume and diversity of work that is clearly not captured in the ever-decreasing space allotted to theatre in regular media in Canada. Theatre tourism in Canada – book your trip on VIA and explore the theatre and the geography of Canada!

When Kelly Nestruck reposts (again) his 2009 article about the pathetic-ness of World Theatre Day, I want to have the numbers to celebrate. To prove that we are championing a form that is experienced, loved and sought out by more people than are captured by StatsCanada or CADAC? That employs so many people. That (if we even knew) is even bigger than the $1.4 billion dollars we spend on live performing arts according to a recent CAPACOA study. To prove that we are not whistling in the dark.

Now, I recognize that in addition to having a passion for live theatre, I have become a bit of a data nerd. But seriously, what would we do with the information if we had the big picture about Canadian theatre?

(And I haven’t even mentioned how we no longer have detail about our audiences – demographically, psycho-graphically – unless you are large enough for a major software solution that… wait, I think that is another 1,000 words entirely…)

Equity In Theatre: And Now for The Straight White Male Perspective

108de3a5e79b89fe4ca67e79960f2138-620x465
Equity in Theatre Symposium Photo via Pat the Dog

Here’s a perfect example of the issue: I am a straight white man writing about women’s equity in theatre.

A recent study shows that women represent less than 30% of Artistic Directors, Directors, and Writers. This is in spite of the fact that over 50% of graduates from theatre schools across Canada are women. This study doesn’t even take into consideration women of colour who make up an even smaller percentage within those stats. Why are artists allowing this to happen? What is at the root of this profound failure? It starts with the fact that I am writing this article.

After a recent symposium discussing the issue of Equity in Theatre, I left riled up. I was raised by a strong feminist lesbian mother who instilled in her three boys a powerful sense of justice and gender equity. I grew up around fiercely independent, outspoken, intelligent female companions who excelled at everything they did. Naively, I thought that equity was dealt with and when casting, directing and auditioning, gender was not at the forefront of my mind. I’m now amazed at how I could have pretended we were in an equal world when these statistics were reflected in the productions of my own company, Shakespeare In The Ruff. But I just supposed other companies were addressing the issue. Until I saw these numbers.

The symposium had breakout discussion groups, one of which centred on the issue of engaging men in Equity in Theatre. (There were only a handful of men at the symposium, only a few of them artistic directors, and mostly of smaller or independent companies.). One of the fundamental problems is that men continue to be the gatekeepers. Even the male AD’s who seem to be attune to issues of equity in theatre, cannot help but program seasons from their perspective as men.

CC - CafeHarvest-clean copyI spoke up in the discussion group and suggested that as a man, I need to start taking less. If there is only one pie being served at the dinner party (and I don’t see another pie full of money being baked for theatre artists any time soon) – women are being served one piece, and men are getting two, the only logical way for the women to have more pie is for men to put some back. I was kindly told, no, the problem is not me. But it is.

As a man, I have easier access to donors, to mobilizing artists, to media coverage, and people are more willing to believe me when I overstate my abilities and experience (something we men do ALL the time). To qualify this, “easier” does not mean easy. Theatre is very hard to make and even harder to generate the resources required. This was my blind spot. In the world of theatre, it doesn’t seem like anybody is getting heard by the public these days. I worked my tail off to establish Shakespeare In The Ruff, but in the frenetic pace of indie theatre, I never stopped to think that maybe I was able to create this company out of an arts ecosystem that favours me – the straight white male.

The notion of someone like me stepping back from self-created opportunities is counter-intuitive. But as Erin Brubacher articulates in this open letter, every piece that we as a community put out into the air, no matter the scope of the project or size of the budget, has an impact and takes up space – space in venues, festivals, media coverage, people’s wallet, and people’s brains. That space that can no longer be occupied by someone else.

Despite polite disagreement, I was congratulated for speaking up on my selfless progressive views at the symposium – I was getting the attention, when I was attempting to do the opposite. Frustrated I posted my views on Facebook when I got home. The result was a whole lot of congratulatory re-postings by women. And again I, a straight white male, was getting the attention for writing about gender equity. I was taking up space.

When I was then asked by SpiderWebShow if I would write an article about the report on Equity in Theatre, I was feeling more than a little self-conscious, so I asked my partner who also works in theatre to write it with me. 500 words a piece and we could split the $50. She would be the token female perspective in the article I was asked to write. Despite an attempt at being enlightened, I was still the gatekeeper on an issue that she lived everyday of her career. She told me to write it myself.

I was finally beginning to understand. As a man, being vocal about gender equity is not the hard part – I am enabled by society to speak my mind on any issue without much fear of the consequences. I’m not viewed as bitter, or a complainer, and I don’t run the risk of offending any artistic directors who might hire me. In fact I’m viewed as a gracious hero and given the spotlight. Regardless of how good that feels, it is not what is needed from me on an issue that is all about who occupies the spotlight. What is needed, and inevitably harder to do, is get out of the way.

CC - OpenSpaceHarvest-cleanI started trying to find out what ‘getting out of the way’ would actually look like. Here are some ideas generated from the symposium and through other conversations I’ve had since.

  • If an article is being written about the show you’re producing, make sure that it is a woman from the production who goes for the interview.
  • Cross gender casting (especially in the classics).
  • Succession planning – If you are an artistic director, or in a leadership position on any scale, when it is time for you to move on, make sure that discussions of Equity in Theatre are front and centre in succession planning.
  • Applying for a job – In application for a job ie. artistic director, director, etc. take the space to acknowledge that you are a white male, and that you support Equity in Theatre even if that means not getting the job.
  • Be vocal on the issue – all genders need to bring this into public and private conversations.
  • The Kilroys List – D’Janet Sears and Karen Hines are spearheading a Canadian version of The Kilroys List, which is a list of the most recommended plays by women for AD’s, producers and literary managers as a way to counter the idea that there aren’t good plays by women.
  • Quotas – We need to start seeing quotas tied to public funding. I believe this would be the fastest way of seeing change on this issue. The stats have barely changed since the 80’s and I don’t think it will be possible without quotas leading the charge of systemic change, – the arts are too competitive, too individualistic to be able to address this issue on through its artists alone. Those of us with privilege will continue to take advantage of it because unemployment is grim and always nipping at our heels as artists no matter our gender or cultural background.

For my part, I’ve made sure that this summer’s production by my own company, Shakespeare In The Ruff, has a 50/50 gender split – the first time in our 4-year existence. This is something I will continue to strive for. I am looking to bring more women into leadership roles. I want to address a deficit of cultural diversity within the company. I want to invite other companies to make their own actions around equity known, and if they don’t have a policy (personal or organizational) to address equity, I believe their art will suffer; their organization will suffer.

May there be an article on Equity in Theatre written by one of the formidable female artists who attended the symposium. For my part, I’m going to shut up, (As soon as this article is done) stop taking up so much space and try (And fail and try again) to find ways that my inherited privilege can be used behind the scenes to give space to the voices that we need to hear more from.

#CdnCult Times; Volume 5, Edition 2

As a cultural community we are continually producing reports. These documents contain essential research on an ecology that I believe more of us are taking collective ownership of, but this information doesn’t always trickle down as much as it could.

Recently three documents were released that seemed to be of real importance to live performance in Canada:

This edition strives to break these documents down, interrogate their results, and open them up for discussion by the wider community. To this end, Shakespeare in the Ruff Artistic Director Brendan McMurtry-Howlett reflects on the Equity in Theatre Symposium and Report, PACT Executive Director Sara Meurling looks at what we can (and can’t) learn from available data, and I take on the emerging  discussion surrounding Shared Platforms.

How can we address the gender imbalance in theatre? How much and what kind of theatre is being made? What shape should new producing models take? These are all essential questions to consider for anyone invested in contemporary live performance.

Michael Wheeler
Editor -in-Chief: #CdnCult

 

Episode #6: Section 27

We explore Section 27 of the Alberta Marriage Act, which requires a doctor’s note and guardian’s permission for dependent adults to marry. Gaelyn and Brodie share their romantic histories with us.
Right To Love Website
Change.org

Episode #5: Santa’s Dressing Room

DFP.5

A peek behind the beard of the Chinook Mall Santa Clause Ben Laird. The DF team encounter the mall’s new app that allows visitors to better control their experience of sitting on Santa’s knee.