After significant interest in our first feminist edition, it became clear three articles could only scratch the surface of the issues it brought up.
After the first one, Keavy Lynch wrote about some of the ideas that were raised – so we invited her back to elaborate upon these thoughts. Alexander Offord also responded to one of those articles – you will find his expanded ideas here too. Lisa C. Ravensbergen completes the issue with some compelling thoughts on feminism from an indigenous cultural perspective. Feminism is back. On #CdnCult Times at least.
On January 12 I flew to Cairo, Egypt, as part of the Theatre Centre’s Tracy Wright Global Archive commissioning project. The project was dreamt up by artistic director Franco Boni and artistic director in residence Ravi Jain, and inspired in part by a bequest from long-time Theatre Centre-based artist, and all round avant-garde superstar, the late, and much revered creator/performer Tracy Wright. Apparently Tracy believed deeply in the importance of artists traveling other places, and investigating what they don’t know, especially when they’re in that great big chasm of mid-career, which I think for many of us means: successful enough to keep making work, and almost never having enough time to think a step back and consider the track that’s gotten you onto that particular work.
I never knew Tracy, but pretty much every artist I love up close or admire from a distance speaks about her in the awed tone that we tend to reserve for folks we consider an actual genius. In honour of that genius, the Theatre Centre asked five us of (myself, Jani Lauzon, Nadia Ross, Daniel Brooks and Denise Fujwara) to each propose a place in the world we’d like to go, and a question we’d like to investigate while there, in whatever terms we might set for that investigation. I chose Egypt, where my father was born and raised, and where I’d previously been once in my life, in December, 2011, when my wife and two sons and I met my Egyptian family for the first time.
My question: what is a revolution? Or, what does it mean, to have had one, three years after the fact? Or six months after the fact, if you ask some people, who consider the toppling of Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi – generally accepted to be the country’s first democratically elected leader – in June, 2013, as the real revolution.
When I arrived in Egypt – on the eve of a national referendum on a new constitution, the country’s third such referendum (and seventh national vote) in 3 years – I had my family, who had agreed to speak to me, both about my dad, and their feelings about the revolution. I also, through a young filmmaker cousin and a friend in Vancouver had potential, but vague, connections to a series of Egyptian intellectuals and artists.
By the time I left, on the day after the third anniversary of the January 25 revolution – and having just witnessed my first car bomb – I had interviewed about a dozen people: April 6 Revolutionary Movement affiliated female journalists who have started their own online news site, in the face of real danger that the government will arrest or shut them down; a famous Egyptian painter who sat on the committee of 50 who wrote the most recent constitution; a theatre artist who goes into villages and writes songs with groups of villagers about whatever they want to write songs about; the artistic director of the Downtown Cairo Arts Festival; my aunt, who is 80 years old and has seen my dad, her brother, once in the last 54 years, for about five days, in 1997, the one time he’s been back to Egypt since 1959, and several others.
I won’t pretend those interviews make it possible for me to understand much about what’s going on in Egypt. I will say, though, that it’s a lot more complicated than any of us in Canada or the west are able to understand. Of course it is – that’s obvious. But it was also a real reminder to me how absurd it is for any of us to read any news about another place and think that somehow that means we could know enough to pronounce about what is actually occurring. That in and of itself might be a colonial impulse , which I’d argue is a very natural and human impulse. But over and over again, with a couple of exceptions, people I talked to asked me to tell my compatriots in America (yeah, whatever) to PLEASE LEAVE US ALONE. “We are poor,” my Coptic cousin priest Marcus told me, “But it is our poverty. And we are ok with this.”
Many also expressed real concern about my safety, as a Canadian, in Canada, because of this winter’s “polar vortex”.
I’m not yet in a position to coherently summarize my experience yet. I don’t have a ton of time to write this, or a ton of room on this blog. What I can maybe do is show you some pictures, to try to give you a sense of the territory that currently interests me.
Cairo rooftops. Understanding Cairo: Logic of a City Out of Control, a terrific book by a Cairo-based urban planner David Sims, charts the miracle of urban growth in Cairo, in which 80% of new development happens outside official government sanction, and yet still manages to provide safe accommodation for millions, and connect to municipal water and electricity. But my relatives and many other westernized Egyptians bemoan the degree to which the city has decayed over the last 30 years. Though the building decay (and ubiquitous piles of garbage) in the city feel typical for an early 21st century developing country with a exploding population, when my Dad left in the early 60’s, downtown Cairo was definitely much tidier. In1959 the country’s population was approx. 27 million. Today it’s close to 80 million, and is growing by a million every 10 months.
My cousin Marcus “the priest”, also named after our mutual grandfather at his Coptic Church in Garden City, the embassy district in the western section of downtown, bordering the Nile river. While interviewing Marcus, I was able to tell him the story of my sister, who was put up for adoption by my parents in the early 1960’s, and then came back into our family in the mid-1990’s, when she contacted my mum. Though he was vaguely aware of the story, no-one had ever sat down and talked him through it. His reaction was moving and hilarious. “It is something different!” he said, half-laughing, half-stammering. “I tell Souraya (my aunt), in the west they do things very different! But here, this is not something we would usually understand.” I told him that the story had a happy ending, which it does – that my sister and I are now unquestionably family. “This is good,” he said, beaming. “This is very good.”
The aftermath of a car bomb outside the Cairo Police Directorate on January 24, which killed 5 and injured dozens. I was up early to go out and take pictures of Cairo street art, which, like all picture taking, was a little risky and better done at dawn, before the streets filled up. Even a kilometer away, the bomb shook the foundations of our hotel, and almost knocked me over in shock. Like all recent bomb attacks (almost all of which target police/military), an unknown, Sinai-based Islamist group claimed responsibility. A large number of Egyptians, maybe a majority, believe the Muslim Brotherhood is behind them, and uses fronts to stage the attacks, in order to preserve their image as a non-violent organization in the west. Is that true? Your guess is as good as mine.
Well-known activist and painter Mohamed Abla, who sat on the committee of 50 that wrote the new constitution. He was a 2011 revolutionary with lots of street cred tapped by the military-backed government to work on the constitution. It passed by an overwhelming majority, but less than 40% of Egyptians voted. Low turnout was attributed to both the Muslim Brotherhood boycott and the decision of young people who led the 2011 revolution not to participate. Abla agrees that young people are alienated from the process. He attributes this partly to the profound generational stasis that affects both of the country’s dominant poles of power, military and religious, both of which are led almost exclusively by men in their 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. He also blames the young, secular revolutionaries naïveté, and petulance about no longer being the in the international media spotlight. Abla is also absolutely convinced that the Muslim Brotherhood is behind all recent bomb attacks. As a teenager he was a member of a radical Islamic group responsible for waves of terror in the 70’s, 80’s and 90’s. “It was an open secret,” he says, “That they were directed by the Brotherhood.”
Story meeting at madamasr.com, an English-language daily news website financed by western NGO’s and run by 25 journalists who became disaffected with the ossified sycophancy of Egyptian state-run and private media (for whom they ran English language media) after the revolution. Of those 25, 90% are women under the age of 35. They are directly connected to the secular April 6 revolutionaries, dozens of whom are now in jail for protesting against military prompted laws that forbid protests of more than 10 people and allow for civilians to be tried in military courts, a long-standing, and much-resented feature of the Mubarak regime. Like most Egyptians, they supported the June 30, 2013 protests against Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood government, which seems universally recognized to have been a disaster, and applauded the military when it deposed Morsi and his government. Now they are depressed, and sure that the country has returned to military rule.
The Nile Corniche next to Tahrir Square. Normally these boats would be rented by tourists. Now they sit mostly empty. My hotel was Lonely Planet’s top rated mid-range hotel in downtown Cairo. Over two weeks I was its only guest. The Egyptair Airbus 330 I flew into Cairo on (from Heathrow) had about 30 people on it, 25 of whom were Egyptian. Of the five or so westerners on the plane, 3 were rumpled, corduroy-wearing American University professor types and two – sitting close to me – were a single pair of middle-age, female tourists. One of them was reading The Kite Runner. Before 2011 tourism represented about 11% of the Egyptian economy. Now it’s next to nothing.
Cairo street art. The graffiti downtown is beautiful, and ubiquitous. Artists like Ganzeer have developed international reputations since the revolution, a kind of Egyptian revolutionary street-art chic. Much of it commemorates people who died, and much – like everything occurring there — remains contested. Pieces are regularly defaced or scraped away, and painted over and the repainted numerous times.
Me, with my Aunt Souraya and my first cousin Sally. This was the second time I’d met them in my life. On my second last day in Egypt, Souraya agreed to talk to me about my dad. She spoke for 75 minutes straight in Arabic, and when I tried to get her to pause, so my cousin could translate, she waved me off, saying, “Your father will understand, your father will understand.” All my relatives – men and women – are professionals, and Christian. All, in my generation and older, are also absolutely convinced that the military’s resumption of control was totally necessary in order to secure the country, and protect it from the real danger of Egypt becoming part of an expanding Islamic caliphate that they argue the US has made inevitable in Iraq and Libya, and may very well sweep through Egypt next. They are truly flabbergasted by the west’s current behaviour toward Egypt. “Do you want terrorists to take over the Middle East?” they demand. “Ask them,” they told me, speaking directly into my iphone mic. “Ask your people in America (sic). Is that what they want?”
Laakkuluk: Shall we get right at it? How, if at all, is your work connected to the world outside?
Matthew: Yes, How do international events impact you? How, if at all, is your work connected to the…world outside world…
Laakkuluk: I think we’re going to have to play with that typo.
Amy: kk. With regards to work being affected by the outside world I guess one lives in hope that others identify with our work, where ever they are from.
Matthew: Yes, making the universal specific.
Laakkuluk: Do you mean that you hope to have some universality in your work?
Amy: Yes, that is what I mean, Thanks for clarifying. Although language can be a barrier, but when I see theatre that is in another language I am still moved somehow. I don’t get to do that often. But…..
Amy: Universality has changed a lot since the internet. In Newfoundland, we used to be so isolated, cut off from the Outside world outside, but the world seems smaller now.
Laakkuluk left the room.
Laakkuluk entered the room.
Matthew: Speaking of cut off-
Amy: Are you having trouble Laakkuluk?
Laakkuluk: Sometimes i just have to look at the screen with the wrong squint and I get cut off. grrr
Amy: Careful of those squints. no dirty looks please.
Laakkuluk: I’ll try not blinking
Matthew: I want to come back to universality. I am interested in the first part of the question.
Matthew: How do International events impact you?
Amy: Like the Olympics? Patrick is going to skate very very soon. I have it on while I chat with you… I can’t help it.
Matthew: That will impact our chat.
Amy: I know. That is the international event right now. It’s sports but it’s what we got now.
Laakkuluk: My family lives in many different countries and so I have a personal connection w/ int’l events
Matthew: Really? Neat. I don’t think International events impact most artists.
Laakkuluk: My mother and I spoke with one of her aunts that lives in Faroe Islands yesterday.
Matthew: How do they impact you Laakkuluk?
Amy: Examples of events Laakkuluk?
Laakkuluk: she said she was cheering for Canadian teams because of our family
Amy: Sweet!
Laakkuluk: meanwhile I had to google who Patrick Chan was…Go Patrick!
Amy: heehee. I guess a lot of the entire world is watching now. Skating is very popular. It is an international language.
Laakkuluk: I find that because I don’t have television at home, I connect to the world differently.
Amy: Yes you would. Do you ever watch tv, or do you just use internet?
Laakkuluk: I watch tv at hotels! otherwise its internet for everything else
Amy: Do you like tv? Why do you not have one at home?
Laakkuluk: I don’t like advertising and commercials being broadcast into my house. I like good programes though, and artistic work and the news but it comes at the cost of watching advertising on the tv.
Amy: Yeah, I watch Netflix, choose what I want to watch a series at a time, and no advertising. Netflix is international, from the States!!
Matthew: I don’t think Netflix is the kind of International event they meant when they assigned this topic. I don’t think International events impact artists very often.
Amy: I have to say we do not get a lot of international representation on the stage here in Nfld.
Laakkuluk: why don’t you think so Matthew?
Matthew: 9-11 may be an exception…but generally artists are making new work about immediate situations. From what I recall of our discussions, we focus on our regions and issues there. Then we hope these are universal.
Amy: unless there is an international crosslink in our neighbourhoods.
Matthew: Or that there are universal qualities in the work.
Laakkuluk: Maybe because I studied political science in university, I don’t quite agree with you
Matthew: Oh, do tell.
Amy: We used to be an English colony not so long ago and I believe that influenced our collective theatre.
Hans Island
Laakkuluk: I think I am attracted to art (theatre and otherwise) that is making political statements and I tend to incorporate political thought in my performance as well. I think I’ve mentioned this before, but I have a piece on the “republic” of Hans Island the ridiculously small island that had disputed ownership between Canada and Denmark.
I guess that even though the piece addresses international dispute, I look at the universality of ice and oneness surrounding the island, as the self-declared President of the Republic of Hans Island!
Amy: Good for you.
Laakkuluk: being Greenlandic-Canadian Inuk myself, I love how silly it all is in the end. The island is only 1.2 km squared
Amy: Newfoundland’s being part of Canada is a very political international event. Many think it happened underhandedly.
Laakkuluk: yes – the internationalism involved in joining Confederation.
Amy: So we are affected by international events. Always, somehow politically.
Laakkuluk: for every single region and culture of Canada
Amy: Yes.
Laakkuluk: or being excluded by Confederation and fighting against colonialism to the present day.
Amy: We are all in this little world together affecting each other.
Matthew: Sure, international events impact us as artists and our work is connected in a universal way, but I am saying these events are seldom the reason for the work. Just a different way of viewing impact I guess. Hans Island is an exception. Are you the president?
Laakkuluk: yup that’s me.
Matthew: Madame President. Nice ring
Amy: I genuflect!
Laakkuluk: Merci. Arise dear Amy. We are all equals
Amy: No, Matthew, We are in the midst of royalty!
Matthew: I don’t know. Sounds like you could declare yourself co-president.
Amy: Ok Patrick’s biggest competition is skating now…. Who’s co-president? Laakkuluk: Like there should be a Greenlandic-Canadian and a Canadian-Greenlandic co-president? I like that
Amy: I’m in. How’s the pay?
Laakkuluk: there’s the problem of citizenship, which is easily solved, as a Canadian, you need to have had a Greenlandic lover, then you’re in.
Amy: Ok I’ll get right on that! Any excuse for a trip to Greenland. I’ve never been.
Laakkuluk: on it, she says…nice
Amy: Laakkuluk, you seem to travel a lot. do you?
Laakkuluk: I’ve been lucky to travel yes. Inuit performance has been good like that!
Amy: Mostly northern communities? Mostly in Canada? Or Where?
Laakkuluk: mostly northern hemisphere travel.
Amy: I’d say it is because you are good, not lucky.
Laakkuluk: northern communities, all over Canada, Scandihoovia, Britain, Germany
Amy: You are an international event.
Laakkuluk: Ha ha. Full of hybrid vigour as my father used to joke.
Amy: You do a lot of dance? Is there a lot of language in your art?
Laakkuluk: I think this seems to bring us back to Matthew’s observation that we make our regional, local perspectives understandable to the greater world.
Matthew: That’s what connects us to the world outside world.
Laakkuluk: Yes, there’s dance – that mask dance I was telling you about. And language for sure, makes me think of concentric circles, that turn of phrase
Amy: Our expression connects us to the outside world?
Laakkuluk: like we make an explosion of discovery within ourselves and then we push that discovery out to share with the world outside world as collaborative groups of artists.
Amy: Couldn’t have put it better myself! That explosion! That discovery. So exciting.
Matthew: Looks like Patrick Chan is about to skate.
Amy: he is…awwwwww
Matthew: A perfect example of an international event that will not impact our art.
Amy: but it will excite us.
Laakkuluk: okay. I’m starting to see what you mean, both of you!
Matthew: I’m only watching because the hockey is between periods.
Amy: he stumbled twice. My nerves!
Laakkuluk: The City of Iqaluit put up a pride flag for the duration of the games
Amy: Yeah we did in St. John’s too.
Laakkuluk: there’s been amazing and important discussion about it in Iqaluit and Nunavut.
Amy: about sexuality equity?
Laakkuluk: That’s an international event that likely affects our work!
Amy: Victoria?
Matthew: I don’t think there is a pride flag up at city hall or the BC leg. But we’ve been talking about it. How does it affect our work?
Amy: Gay rights you mean?
Laakkuluk: makes me feel like I need to be working more to discuss openness and diversity within the Nunavut community.
Matthew: Yes, Amy. Just curious about how it impacts our work.
Laakkuluk: there’s a sizeable group of people who are amazingly homophobic in Nunavut and another sizeable group that embrace diversity
Amy: openness and inclusivity, is always important in our work. But is it represented much is another question.
Laakkuluk: I think it’s important for performers like me to be helping with diversity and inclusivity
Amy: I do too Laakkuluk. Example is a good start. Lead by example. What we teach our children….by example.
Matthew: I feel like this particular issue impacts my life more than my work. I don’t make work on this topic, but I encourage diversity in my workplace. And encourage my child to be accepting.
Amy: But your life impacts your work. It’s in there somewhere.
Matthew: Yes, but it is hard to draw the connection in a direct way.
Amy: Patrick Chan got silver!
Matthew: Wow. You saw that before me.
Laakkuluk: that was fast!
Amy: Sorry. We are closer to Russia than you! 🙂
Laakkuluk: See – this is also a fun way of getting the news.
Matthew: For a moment there I had a secret Patrick Chan did not know.
Laakkuluk: I hear it from cool people like you
Amy: Anyway Matthew, you were saying…it is hard to make a connection to inclusivity and gay rights in your work?
Matthew: Yes. Not sure I can cover this in a chat, but…there is not a straight line (no pun intended) between this issue and my art making. There are other artists better poised to tell this story.
Amy: Yeah, I can see that. I identify. But we practice being open and inclusive in our lives
Laakkuluk: nor should it be a particularly straight line all the time.
Amy: though it may not be outwardly apparent, I believe our compassion shines through.
Laakkuluk: there we go!
Matthew: Thanks for the chat
Laakkuluk: Yes! Always a pleasure! Until the next time!
I’m presently traveling through Thailand for a quick holiday with my partner. I’m writing this from my phone at Railay beach in Krabi. Overlooking a sunset and crowds of mainly white westerners who, like me, have spent money to be not home. I’m typically conflicted about these trips. I want to see beyond my back yard and am happy tourism dollars stimulate otherwise struggling economies. But I can’t shake that we take these places for our leisure, make them ours and passively add them to our storybooks while neglecting the past, present and future of the people who’s homes we rent.
Flight delays handed us an overnight stay in Narita, Japan. Refusing to content ourselves to an airport hotel, we found a quiet hole in the wall restaurant swapping smiles and broken flowers with two patrons and the wait staff. Ca-Na-Da. That is our home.
They knowingly nod.
Yes, on est hiver. Many medals drape our athletes necks.
A few minutes pass before one remembers the sweetness of maple. “Syrup”, they proclaim, grinning the silliest of smiles.
Yes, our maple syrup is the best. I try to explain the tale of the great syrup heist of 2012. Pretty sure it was gibberish to them, but there was a quirky universality I had hoped they could relate to.
In the end, I know that this is what Canadians are to most of the world. Maple syrup and winter sports. Japan is sushi and sumo wrestlers. The U.S. is cowboys and hot dogs. France is baguettes and the Eiffel Tower. Thailand? Pad thai. National identities reduced to food, accessories, landscapes and sports.
In 2005, I co-founded Tableau D’Hôte Theatre, a company dedicated to presenting English plays from the Canadian cannon to Montréal audiences. The works of Walker, Thompson, Panych & co. had mainly been ignored by the larger houses and I was enamoured that such plays were written by Canadians, a concept that sorely lacked from my high school education.
9 years and many political battles later, I’m often embarrassed by our mandate. I stand proud of our work and the artists we create with, but it’s strange that somebody who doesn’t particularly like Canada, to dedicate time, money and health to indirectly trumpeting Canadiana.
Canada isn’t my land to love. It’s stolen land. We operate on unceded, unconquered and unsurrended native territories. Everything I’ve experienced and everything I am is a direct result of mass genocide and centuries of colonialism. Our governments unwillingness to acknowledge these truths and honour treaties fills me with rage and shame and I no longer hold any illusions to the myth of the peaceful,compassionate, progressive Canadian.
Of course, all states have their their triumphs and travesties, and one joy of traveling may be the bliss of simply passing through. Little to cling on to other than your personal baggage and itinerary. But this rhythm is of great disservice to artists and storytellers when it ignores the here and the now and the then of the people around us.
Our hostel in Bangkok happened to be situated smack dab in the epicentre of the #ShutdownBangkok movement. Hordes of protesters have set up camp in the middle of one of the busiest commercial arteries. Despite my best efforts to understand the revolutionary movement before arriving, much of it remains lost on me.
It’s normal. Complex geopolitical realities aren’t exactly easy material to absorb. Understanding what rests beneath class breakdowns isn’t as simple as noticing extremely visible urban economic disparities. To begin to understand this, we need access to stories and storytellers. Access that is neither easy to find at home or abroad.
Abroad – most specifically when on holiday – we’re faced with extreme time constraints atop linguistic barriers. Whereas at home, our culture and stories are largely filtered through mass media conglomerates. Resistance begets resistance and without the tools to disseminate stories we remain complacent to our collective struggles.
And therein lay the power of the great equalizer that was promised to be the World Wide Web. Here, communities gather and intersect to share stories and fight back against economic injustice, against patriarchal forces, and against systemic and institutional white supremacy. Adequate translating and web accessibility permitting, both tales of a Thai uprising in Bangkok and the fight to save a student-run community garden at Carleton may be analysed, celebrated and spread far and near.
We are still relatively in the early stages of the game changer that is the Internet and much remains to be learned (and protected) if we are to reach an iota of its true potential.
As theatre artists, we need to challenge ourselves to see past imaginary invisible lines on maps and embrace the multitude of voices stepping up to change worlds. We must share these stories all while remaining mindful of cultural appropriation. The Internet is vital to making sense of complex matters and without it we’re left to cliché snapshots, cheesy tour books, and blankly staring at silent Just For Laughs gags in a room filled with people who each carry thousands of unheard stories. Without it, we’re left to Olympic medals and maple syrup.
In my prompt to the Geographic Correspondents, I unintentionally included the language how does the “world outside world” impact your work? It has a ring to it though.
This Canadian world, despite spanning thousands of kilometers, has a remote consistency to it. Deceivingly immune from world events, it is possible to be an artist here who delves not too seriously into that kind of thing.
This edition contains articles that challenge that notion: Geographic Correspondents get into everything from Netflix to the Olympics, Neworld AD Marcus Youssef reflects on his Theatre Centre-sponsored trip to Egypt, and Mathieu Murphy-Perron writes from Thailand on his mobile phone.
Where are we going, with whom, and how are we connected to all of the people on this earth?
Wherein Jacob and Adrienne talk about how much a person can do, what “the audience” wants and the pros and cons of independent theatre festivals for developing new work. iTunes | RSS
They also talk about:
the benefits of leaving hang-out space when programming cultural events,
whether David Mamet is a cheery sort of guy,
different forms of community theatre,
the importance of doing it yourself,
starting where people are,
the relative merits of patronage,
crowd-sourced funding,
Adrienne’s approach to writing Final Reports,
Jacob’s waves of Vancouver-envy, and
when the audience’s experience of a show begins.
Tune in another time when Adrienne and Jacob re-discuss topics they had to cut from this podcast including their perceived differences between theatre practice in Vancouver and Toronto and applying research-based design principles to devising theatre.
Teesri Duniya’s production of Bhopal by Rahul Varma
In inviting me to write this article, I was asked by in a broad sense, “how is democracy present for you as an artist today?” With a short period of time and 1000 words to weigh in on this loaded question, I address it with my personal viewpoint acquired through working as artistic director of Teesri Duniya Theatre, a culturally diverse theatre, and as a political playwright.
If democracy is a multiparty, one-person-one-vote system guaranteeing freedom, liberty, right to resist, and dispensing things of common good — Canada is a delightful democracy chockfull of parliamentary debate on a variety of issues, orders, disorders, delivering some sort of equality to men and women and equals and unequals alike. We are free to think. However freedom to think has not produced an ideological variety. Our democracy is restricted to ideologically similar parties supported by corporations pursuing corporate agendas. Slight deviation comes from cautiously left-leaning parties that have never formed the central government.
By definition, democracy accommodates all groups of people no matter how unalike they may be from one another, which explains why Canadian democracy has accommodated a separatist party in Parliament whose agenda it is to break the country in the name of ethnocentric nationalism. However, despite a handful national, regional and issue based political parties, we also know that democracy is present in Canada because existing parties and the population basically believe in the same history — the history of “founding fathers” attempting to build the Canadian nation along same set of ideas, same goals and same aspirations.
Two banners that the system has effectively used to mobilize masses in nation-building are the God and the flag. But contemporary Canada is more than founding fathers symbolizing bi-cultural Canada. Increasingly, many native born and new Canadians have joined First Nations Canadians in questioning past accounts of history. Many Canadians believe God and the flag means less or is an irrelevant yardstick of democracy and nation-building. In today’s time, a true democracy would be the one that takes into consideration previously eclipsed determinants such as cultural plurality, equality, race, languages, ethnicity, gender and differences. In absence of that, it is safe to say that we are stuck with a democratic government of the few i.e. white, Eurocentric, heterosexual male masquerading as a democracy.
Let’s talk about democracy in context of arts and culture.
Canada is signatory to the UN declaration (2001) that says, “Respect for diversity of cultures, dialogue and cooperation, are among the best guarantees of international peace and security.” Clearly there is recognition that Canada is a culturally diverse country. Respected philosopher Charles Taylor, points out in his book “Multiculturalism and The Politics of Recognition”, that equal recognition of all cultures is “not just the appropriate mode for a healthy democratic society, its refusal can inflict damage on those who are denied it…”
To answer the initial question as to how democracy is present for me as an artist – I have to examine if democracy has resulted in recognition of diversity, plurality, and equitable public policies in the arts and cultural field. Are we governed by policies that treat all cultural strands equally? Do we have a mechanism that supports aesthetic quality of all cultural forms equally? Is same market value assigned to all artistic products regardless of cultural, racial and gender differences? Or is there a racial and cultural underpinnings in our policies that allow the “founding cultures” to be perceived as mainstream while the rest – Aboriginal people, mixed race, and Canadians of African, Asian, South Asian, Arab, Muslim and Latino descent — the “Other” are reserved to stay on the margins?
I have the freedom to create what I believe is relevant and am passionate about. The Canada Council, our central arts body, is an equal opportunity institution and has policies in place for racial and cultural equality in the arts. This has provided me, to an extent, necessary conditions to create art. Presence of policy hasn’t however brought equality across cultures. Our art scene is still hierarchical in old terms of reference – Anglo-French, trailed by First Nations and other cultural strands.
A larger question is how I use democracy in my own creations. Do I use the freedom democracy has offered me to create meaningful art that overcomes silence, addresses controversies, creates difficult works, and highlights minorities and the marginalized. The most important use of democracy is to overcome censorship; even more important is to overcome self-censorship. Democracy will not have any meaning if all it does is create safe theatre that is pleasing and consumable out of fear that the big theatres would not produce it.
Recently, my play Bhopal was produced by the Teesri Duniya Theatre to a very successful run in Montreal. One of the world’s worst industrial disasters occurred in the city of Bhopal, India killing 25,000 people to date and counting. Thirty years after the disaster, survivors are suffering neurological and respiratory sickness, birth defects, disability and malformation among children. The play is a reminder that the frequency of industrial disasters is on the rise all over the world with recurring accidents of oil spills, pipeline leaks, dumping of hazardous chemicals and closer to home, the recent disaster at Lac-Mégantic.
The Bhopal gas disaster happened because multinational corporations have relocated manufacturing to the developing countries where human rights laws are inadequate, wages are low and environmental regulations are virtually nonexistent. I see a close relationship between democracy, dramatization of human condition and creativity, which makes us aware of what is going on in the world we live in. And so, democracy works as the backbone of creativity that generates a consciousness. When artists are able to create consciousness — things happen.
Events of this past week – which I’m naming “This Ontario Week in Sochi Canada” – brought to mind a moral question beautifully crystallized in @praxistheatre’s production of Rifles. In the play, a fierce woman fights to maintain and pass on the power of her moral compass to her family. In a harrowing moment when the woman discovers that yet another family member has been taken she loses her fight and picks up the very tools used to bludgeon her in the first place. She becomes one of “them”, the faceless enablers of atrocity. She becomes the user of rifles. It made me wonder, what would I resort to if I were stripped of the ideas and communities that ground me in my world? She fails, would I?
It is with this in mind that I tackle two moments in this week that was where the democratization – for better or worse – of media was in full bloom.
First, there was the slurpee-sized moment when mayor Rob Ford attempted to block the city of Toronto from joining an international protest against Russia’s homophobic policies by flying the Pride Flag at City Hall. What fun! How current! A great doctored shot of him riding naked on a horse with Putin made the Twitter Party Circuit. Slurp, snort, Brain-freeze! Ford lost his battle-of-the-flag and much of the win can be attributed to a simultaneous counter offensive afforded us through a more democratized media. So the day was won, in part, due to our individual ability to respond to a big bomb with a million tiny pistols.
Fantastic! But it seems like everybody is sharing being overwhelmed by the power of “the status quo” (often misattributed as synonymous with free speech). Enter (again) Rob Ford and his brother Doug, taking to the democratized airwaves with their own YouTube Show. Democratization of Western media means – basically–that everyone is doing it. (Or can)
Next up was the @CBCOntarioToday phone-in show called “Is live theatre dead to you?” I finally turned my attention to the podcast when I read about a petition started by @GoodOldNeonTO. It was the petition that actually got me to listen, not the good natured tweets before and during its airing: conflict in life, like in drama, being the hook.
The out of the gates response from my Twitteratti was about the dumbed down conversation and the problematic frames used for engaging with the topic. I will disclose here that I have not signed the petition.
What I did do – quite uncharacteristically – was take to Twitter with a list of reasons for why I liked the show. In addition to my Twitter list I liked the binary, or the simplistic, or the reductive framing because it allowed the space to hear things that I think are valuable to hear. I liked hearing about the barriers to going to theatre and felt that the general tenor of the show did allow for conversion. And I loved hearing that someone thought there would be real cats in Cats. Why? Because that is no less strange (or less imaginative) than the wonderful Daschund UN that @WorldStageTO and @FTAMontreal treated Canadians to last year. I would have been really bummed if I had turned up to find humans in dog suits at that show.
But there were two things that I did not enjoy and these connect back to Rob Ford’s Phobic Pride Flag debacle.
The first was the evident fear of art. The concern that art’s end-game is a kind of corruption seemed to seep through what I can only assume was a well-intentioned desire to celebrate a bold move by Brendan Healy, Artistic Director of Buddies in Bad Times Theatre, when last year he made a bold inquiry (paraphrased here): “Why, please tell me, are you not coming to my theatre?” Strange then to feel that answers to his question were formulated before the first caller hit the air. There was an indication from the show (and refuted point-for-point on the petition page (referred to above) that people don’t go to theatre because they are too busy going elsewhere (a spurious argument). Moreover, that to go to the theatre requires “erudition” (oh please Rita, really?) or an appetite for being ripped off.
None of this really bothered me. I enjoy this kind of easy-breezy “this bugs me and that bugs me” kind of deal. What did bother me was the underlying sensibility that phobia is a basic lens through which all discussion of art and sexuality must be seen.
There appears to be an ergo that now links an expression of the unknown with the engenderment of fear in the hypothetical audience member. If you listen to the show you will encounter a vivid description of entrapment whereby a man and his wife, unsuspecting victims of American commercial art, were lured into a house of ill repute, and their very souls were drained of life force in fact made them feel murderous. I was so relieved they got out of there alive and held my breath ‘til story’s end for fear that he might have died at the hands of this awful, awful theatre experience! I exaggerate and the above is sarcastic, the lowest form of something, but the story was woven through with the basic presumption that the unknown is always a trap.. The actual story starts the show at 2:48 on the podcast.
The phobia continued into new terrain with Buddies In Bad Times Theatre being referred to as “a professional company in Toronto…” – What is professional? Please will somebody tell me so that I can tell other people? – without ever mentioning its Queer status. Was this a “gift” from the mother corps to Buddies? Here ya go! Here’s your hard fought for legitimacy? Or was it to ensure that the CBC would not offend homophobic listeners and therefore – so the story goes – further diminish their listening base? God I hope neither is true, but after This Ontario Week in Sochi Canada it is hard not to go there.
Earlier I asked what I would become if I, like the protagonist in Rifles, lost my markers of self. I think that it might be choosing to hate those that hate me. How can I arm myself against this? I don’t want to fail at this.
We exist in a brief moment of opportunity to reinvent our democracy as The Senate of Canada is challenged and reshaped by Parliamentarians.
Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has de-franchised Liberal Members of the Senate, proposing further changes that would create a replacement system for Senators similar to the Order of Canada; Official Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair has renewed calls for Senate abolition; The Harper Government has already requested clarification from The Supreme Court of Canada about what reforms are Constitutionally possible.
The Senate of Canada, modeled on The House of Lords, contains 105 members and came into being through The British North America Act in 1867. Senators are appointed by The Governor General upon the advice of the PM. A ‘sober house of second thought’ that legislation must pass through to become law, the only qualifications required to be a Senator are that one must be both older-than-30 and Canadian. Over the years this has become largely a patronage appointment for party loyalists.
The three major parties are at odds with one another about how our democracy should develop. Both the NDP and Conservatives are opposed to Trudeau’s suggestion we should continue to appoint and not elect the people who draft and pass our laws. Both Liberals and Conservatives prefer reform to the Constitutionally-challenged proposal by the NDP who have never had a Senator to “Roll Up The Red Carpet”. The NDP and Liberals are united in their frustration at eight years of talking about Senate reform, while promoting 59 Conservative Senators.
This impasse can be resolved through the singular mechanism of the The Governor General by incorporating other titles the position already awards to create a Senate that is a creative meritocracy.
Proposal for abandoned metro station in Paris, inspiration for Senate abandoned by Canadians.
The Senate need not be reformed using a system similar to The Order of Canada as Greg Sorbara suggested in the Toronto Star, six months before Justin Trudeau re-suggested the proposal this January. A much simpler and immediate solution would be a Senate comprised of actual members of The Order of Canada. Rather than create a second system to discover exemplary Canadians, we should remain with the impartial, non-partisan system that is already in place to identify the best and brightest as awarded by The Governor General.
The order has a three-level hierarchy of Member (C.M.), Officer (O.C.) and Companion (C.C). These levels of achievement could be represented proportionally, or through some other mechanism that recognizes these distinctions. Immediately, this would alter the quality and ability of our Senators from ‘breathing person born before 1984’ to ‘best country has to offer’.
This revitalized cohort of Senators would be tasked with contributing to Parliament in innovative ways that leaves the drafting of legislation to elected representatives. Following The Speech From The Throne by The Governor General laying out the Government’s priorities for the year, these Senators would be tasked with investigating the surrounding issues and representing them through artistic practice.
This would be facilitated by those possessing another honour bestowed by the GG: Governor General’s Arts Award Winners in Performing Arts, Literature, History, Visual and Media Arts, and Architecture. Authors could be paired with scientists, statisticians with sopranos, judges with directors, academics with transmedia artists, farmers with architects, and infinite likeminded variations.
The short distance between The Senate and The National Arts Centre should lead to a formal arrangement between two institutions, both of which are already directly funded by Parliament. There will be a significant amount of artistic direction and administration required for these reforms to be implemented. Fortunately, it will be relatively easy to connect the two physically through underground tunnel beneath Wellington St., for The NAC to seamlessly take on its new role of facilitator of this multiplicity of relationships between Members of The Order of Canada, GG Winners, and the works and presentations they will create in The Senate.
The Senate itself will be transformed into a multi-purpose venue that will allow intense exploration and presentation of these issues as well as access for Canadians. The single biggest tourist attraction in Ottawa, it will act as a theatre, museum, concert hall, studio, digital laboratory, and workspace. An open-source intellectual crucible, The Senate will forge great and unprecedented responses to the issues elected Parliamentarians in The House of Commons will be drafting legislation to face.
An increasingly fragmented and digitally integrated 21st Century requires a government that can inspire, inquire, reflect and debate with rigour. While Parliamentary committees and debate will investigate the nuts and bolts of bills; the creative meritocracy in The Senate will complement this work by engaging in non-linear and imaginative practices related to the legislation. Embracing both rational knowledge and the power of creative thought, The Senate of Canada will become our strategic advantage as a nation that has a pro-active elite body to explore the problems we face and relate them to Members of Parliament and all Canadians.
Change is coming to The Senate of Canada. At this moment in time, when reform seems inevitable, but no one knows what form it will take, Creative Change in The Senate is possible. An onsite workspace/venue, populated by the brightest Canadians, partnered with our most exciting artists, it will become a model for advanced democratic engagement globally. Our Provincial Parliaments function admirably without an upper-house reviewing their legislation, now is the time to transform our Federal upper-house into an institution that truly prizes higher
thought.