Burning Vision

Play: Burning Vision || Playwright: Marie Clements
Shoot: Pointe St. Charles || Models: Charles Blais
LITTLE BOY: Every child is scared of the dark, not because it is dark but because they know sooner, or later, they will be discovered. It is only a matter of time… before someone discovers you and claims you for themselves. Claims you are theirs because they were the first to find you, and lay claim on you…Not knowing you’ve known yourself for thousands of years. Not knowing you are not the monster.
Burning Vision was commissioned by Rumble Theatre and developed in partnership with Playwrights Workshop Montréal
From Where I Stand: Alexandra Lord

The question of finding the time to define the future of theatre while being deeply immersed in making theatre was one of the main questions on my mind during the conference From Where I Stand: Canadian Theatre in Context this past weekend. I was glad to take a break from my many school projects to join in on this reflection of Canadian theatre history in conversation with other students and invited theatre practitioners from across the country.
The conference was opened with a wine and cheese Friday night. While waiting for Sarah Stanley’s keynote address I took a moment to look around me and acknowledge some of the most inspiring performers, technicians, managers, designers, writers and directors that I have ever met. I took Sarah’s guidance to heart. She said, in this country we should always act like we will meet again because Canadian theatre is still that small. While at the school it is easy to focus on our individual experiences determined by our specific program demands, I think it is essential that we bear witness to our parallel artistic development and how they differ from
program to program. After all once we move past these walls we will inevitably meet again so why not start getting to know each other as best we can now?

With just enough time to digest I joined my fellow students for a main course of theatre wisdom at the long table discussion on Saturday morning. Listening to all of the contributors define where they stand as being build from where they came from got me thinking about my own roots. I was brought straight back to summers savouring local stories at 4th Line Theatre. Being a small-town girl from central Ontario is one of the many lenses through which I experience theatre. As my focus has expanded past that I have often wondered if I could return and if so what that place would have to offer me now? After so much time away from home the more important question is, is there something relevant I could offer in return?
I left the farm to get a taste of the theatre scene in Toronto. The most nourishing experience was interning with the education outreach department at Soulpepper Theatre, facilitating story-telling workshops with youth with little-to-no previous theatre experience. Since I have been in Montreal my time has been more focused on my own personal artistic development with less energy to dedicate to community outreach. Which is why Annabel Soutar’s statement about theatre as a niche community that only speaks to itself really touched me. This movement from
a one-sided artistic monologue to a dialogue with non-theatre makers is what I think is really important in our active re-imagining of what theatre can be in the future. I truly believe that this should be part of our education at every stage in our development.
Another particular lens of mine that I would like to expose is that the last three years of my life have been spent in another dialogue, constantly in translation. The costume and set design program is the only bilingual program at the school in one of the only bilingual cities in Canada. Montreal has offered me a whole new palette to create from which has relied on a constant dialogue over difference which I think is essential in understanding the future of Canadian theatre. From where I stand, on my way out the door of NTS, I hope to continue having these conversations from different perspectives exposing not only the contrast between
anglophone and francophone theatre in Canada but also posing an inquiry into all other conflicting national narratives. Such as questioning why indigenous theatre in Canada has been pushed past the fringes of the festival circuit of our own country, finding a more engaged audience in the international scene.
If we take the time to gather like this more often, the question of what theatre in the future will be becomes much easier to swallow. I have no idea if I will be returning home after I graduate, working in a professional or educational context or in which language or culture I will be immersed. But I do know that wherever I end up I will be collaborating within a community.
We will be actively engaging in the future together not only through the work we do but equally through the conversations we have about the relevancy of this work. We have to continue taking time outside of our busy schedules to reflect on the theatre we are so busy making. If we can continue to come together, despite distance or difference, we will be able to share this experience of re-imagining Canadian theatre, one small bite at a time.
From Where I Stand: Annabel Soutar

7 things I see about theatre and Canada, and about theatre in Canada.
1. Canada seems to be deeply divided ideologically today. This might be an imaginary perspective nourished by the mainstream media to keep us interested in stories about politics in our country. My experience travelling around Canada is that people share a lot of common ground but rarely have enough contact with one another to express that common ground.
2. Theatre is underfunded, under attended, and under practiced in Canada – which is weird because if there is one medium that can re-align imaginary narratives, it is the theatre. I want to accelerate misaligned narratives through the work I do making documentary plays.
3. Collective impact is a big buzzword in Canada right now. We need to do things together but we are so segregated into professional, ideological and cultural silos. We need to build a common narrative in Canada, a national story. This common narrative should not be confused with patriotism. It should be conceived as a story about diverse people learning how to talk with each other again to tackle common challenges; building new language that doesn’t immediately try to force consensus but that allows for dissidence, dissonance, awkwardness, uncertainty, failure to connect as a process through which we have to pass to find connection again. It is a story that takes the conversation away from the experts and gives it back to the citizen – the true power behind Canada’s democracy. Democracy, as managed by political experts, is a farce right now in Canada if we judge it by the conversation that is taking place in the House of Commons.
4. Theatre of the citizen is not simply political theatre. It is deeply personal. Because none of us lives alone. We make political decisions every day in the way we speak to people, the way we spend our money, the way we raise our kids, the way we care for our parents. Politics is not reading the newspaper and being up on political affairs or deciding to become an MP, or starting an NGO, or declaring that you are apolitical. It is a conversation we have with one another in order to share the planet as gracefully as possible. The lack of grace today in political dialogue is a symptom of this abuse of the true definition of politics. The theatre is a medium that can and should attempt to inject some grace back into political dialogue.
5. I am not trying to make a point (right now) or when I write a play. I am trying to start a conversation. The conversation is about: why are we behaving this way in Canada today? Character is what character does. What Canada does today is Canada’s character. We have to put that character on stage so people can see it. Because it’s quite a crazy picture. It’s also very funny and entertaining and can sell a lot of theatre tickets and maybe even some merchandise.
6. Theatre artists are amongst the most brilliant people in Canada but they are generally destitute and marginalized. Why is this? We should be leading our country, not just observing it.
7. Theatre is serving a cultural elite and is not generally considered relevant to people working in other professions. Why are we theatre artists talking just to ourselves? What’s the point? How can we integrate theatre back into the fabric of day-to-day life for people? Are we afraid to reach outside our black boxes to participate in other arenas? Are we prepared to use our skills to serve society in a different way?
From Where We Stand: Carly Chamberlain & Tanya Rintoul
National Theatre School Directors and guest editors of this volume of the SpiderWebShow Carly Chamberlain and Tanya Rintoul, reflect on last weekend’s conference while eating sushi at their desks and pretending they are in separate rooms.

So. Let’s talk about this thing we organized a couple weeks ago!

it was really only one week and two days ago

I have no idea what day it is right now.

All I know is that it happened.
The long table portion of the day was suuuuper interesting: engaging, contentious, funny and frustrating, covering lots of big questions…. I had to go back today to remember what the initial question Sarah started us off with was. And now that I have, I’m interested to see what our responses would’ve been had we not been diligently live-tweeting!
So: If you could change anything about how you’re living your life today what would it be?

I would have exercised today.
But, seriously…
I would be more aware of the world. Of the things that indirectly affect me. I have avoided those things for a long time. Especially political things, because often the uncertainty of what the truths are really overwhelm me.
How about you?

I’m always thinking about changing my relationship to fear. It’s evolving…but slowly. I feel like I have to constantly practice the habit of running face first into the things (both creatively and personally) that freak me the fuck out. And every time I think I’m getting better at it, something new and scary presents itself.

I relate to that too. I think that’s a big part of engaging with change, and as artists we do that everyday (even when we don’t read the newspaper)


One of the very first things that was said during the morning that really stuck with me, was when Sarah (Garton Stanley) said, “We feel as citizens and respond as artists”. That seemed to be a recurring theme throughout the conference.

Absolutely. It is such a wonderful framework. One that I honestly hadn’t considered before, in those specific terms. I think identity outside of being an artist is something that I often struggle to name.

ooh yeah that’s a big challenge and question as (relatively) young artists. Which came first our identities as artists? or citizens? or women? etc…- I feel like coming back to school and taking a break from creating (while working a million joe jobs) has started to open up the conversation with myself about WHY I create, and for whom, and why this medium…

‘Why’ is such a big question. When it comes down to it there are so many reasons, and so many definitions of those reasons. For example the discussion at the long table about who our work is for. Who is it serving?
We talked a lot about community. And how it inspires and impacts what we are saying and doing with our work. This is often challenging for me, as I have never felt a part of a community outside of my artistic one.

Yeah I get that, and I think it’s a super common experience. We spend so much time in theatre schools, and with our collaborators, these super inspiring, but ultimately privileged environments, that I think we all so quickly look inward instead of outward.
But also — what is community?? Especially as a young Canadian??


It is hard to look outside that bubble.

hmm. I guess I think of community as some group of people with shared values or backgrounds, something that unites them. but more and more I feel like there are wide gaps between my experience of the world and that of people seemingly similar to me, so how can the work possibly speak to that? But actually, maybe that’s the point — sort of what Annabel Soutar was getting at too – that finding a national narrative isn’t about patriotism or a single voice…but bringing diverse perspectives learning how to talk to each other again
so maybe the artistic work of our generation isn’t about communicating to a single community, but finding ways to connect with differing perspectives
both finding common ground and acknowledging the gaps too

I think acknowledging but also accepting the gaps is crucial. There is a power in having different perspectives in our artistic voices because there is a great tension between ideas that also tells a story. There doesn’t have to be terms of agreement, or a fight to prove that one’s voice is more important or more ‘right’ than another.
We don’t have to agree or even get along.
Like Annabel said “a new language that doesn’t force consensus.”
I wonder though how to begin to form a new language. It feels like a vicious cycle….wouldn’t we have to agree on not agreeing in order to move forward on new terms?
The overall experience of the table was that there were a lot of voices looking for change. But not half as many answers for how.
And I don’t know what that means for the future.

And just like our etiquette for The Long Table….”there is no conclusion”…..
But just because there’s no conclusion doesn’t mean we can’t take our ideas and discussions and put them into action. We don’t need to wait for consensus to change the form of dialogue, we can just do it.
Ok, problem solved. What’s next?
#CdnCult Times; Volume 4, Edition 2
Welcome to the first edition of #CdnCult Times to be guest-curated.
As part of SpiderWebShow’s role presenting the ‘From Where I Stand’ forum on Canadian Theatre at The National Theatre School, Sarah Garton Stanley and myself worked with directing students Carly Chamberlain and Tanya Rintoul to create the event and social design that accompanied it. The final element of this design is this edition.
Tanya and Carly discuss their observations about the ideas presented and you can also find the video archive of the forum in their article, playwright and forum speaker Annabel Soutar contributes observations from her 5 minute talk, and NTS design student Alexandra Lord reflects on the importance of dialogue and ideas to push the medium forward. Thanks to the school and Howlround for providing incredible venues and resources off and online at SpiderWebShow’s first livestreamed event.
Michael Wheeler
Editor-in-Chief: #CdnCult Times
The Only Stranger at the Gala
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS
Vicki and Jacob talk galas. Are they different when they’re for surf museums? Do you want to bring your hobbies into work? Launch of the 2nd SWS Podcast series.
Tweet us here:
Vicki Stroich @vickistroich
Jacob Zimmer @jacobzimmer
Things we talk about:
- Spiderwebshow
- Alberta Theatre Projects
- Small Wooden Shoe
- The Fun Palace Radio Variety Show
- California Surf Museum
- Dick Dale
- John Severson: Google 20 percent time
- Banff Centre for the Arts Leadership
You also heard this:
Song: “You Don’t Surf So Shut Up” by Waylon Thornton and the Heavy Hand from the Free Music Artchive
Artaud as your boss?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS
SWS Podcast 12
Sarah Garton Stanley, Vicki Stroich and Zimmer talk “leadership” in theatre and life, brain drain and whether one would want Artaud would be a good boss. And yes, surfing.
You can tweet us here:
Things we talk about:
- Spiderwebshow
- National Arts Centre
- Alberta Theatre Projects
- Small Wooden Shoe
- The Fun Palace Radio Variety Show
- Caravan Farm Theatre
- Literary Managers and Dramaturgs of the Americas
- Leadership Panel at LMDA Conference
- AIDS Commitee of Toronto
- Jacob Wren
- @EverySongIveEve
- The Routledge Companion to Dramaturgy
Surviving Wor(l)ds

Play: Surviving Wor(l)ds || Playwright: Endre Farkas
Shoot: Pointe St. Charles || Models: Jaclyn Turner, Will Mathers
VOICE 1: Here… here, there is no direction that leads anywhere.
VOICE 2: In circles in circles in circles in circles in circles in circles in circles in circles in circles in circles.
VOICE 3: In circles, in shadows, in shade, one, two, three, in circles, in shadows, in shade, one… two… three…
VOICE 1: Here is nowhere. Here we must hold hands.
VOICE 2: And take the next step.
VOICE 1: The struggle against the sucking mud.
Surviving Wor(l)ds was first produced by the Elysian River Theatre at Geordie Theatre in Montréal in 1999
Peter Hinton
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS





