Page 31

What is the “IT”? NORTHBOUND 63 in rehearsal

What is the “IT” that we are trying to pin down when we talk about Climate Change?

When the NORTHBOUND 63 collective sits down to talk about this show, there is a lot of talk about “IT”. What is the “IT” that we wrestle with when contemplating the question of how to stop, or even reverse the path global capitalism has committed us to?

It’s difficult to define what we’re up against and who is implicated when we look at humanity in the face of climate change. The answers are much deeper and more complex than: Big Bad Oil. They are rooted in a system that implicates all of us. That is the rabbit hole we’ve jumped down with NORTHBOUND 63.

Sky Sounds pt.1: Rico’s Requiem

DFP.ep7

In this our seventh episode, we talk to local artist and musician Kenna Burima who has created the deeply personal composition ‘Rico’s Requiem’ for the Carillon in the Calgary Tower – the city’s largest instrument.

This is our first instalment of the Sky Sounds series – you can hear all three episodes in the series now in the +15 System in the Arts Commons building in downtown Calgary. We’ll be streaming Sky Sounds 2 & 3 in early July and August both on iTunes and right here on SpiderWed Sound. So tune in and listen up…

The Deep Field in the +15 at Arts Commons

Reflections on The Study/Repast

 

2015-05-12 12.06.19
From Left: Jesse Wabegijik, Alanis King, Jeremy Proulx and Justin Many Fingers

“I was one of the first people here and I’ve been trying to join the discussion for a while and its hard….I do not have the experience that everyone else here has. I have not been as thoroughly trained as every one else has but…I know what its like to not be able to speak to wait for other’s to say what they have they say but it hurts to be sitting at a table where everyone is supposed to be able to speak…and to not be able to speak. I’m the youth at the table I’m one of the youngest people here. I’ve struggled with trying to speak because I feel that I do not have the wisdom or the strength to be able to say what I have to say…and honestly I know that there are other people out there who want to speak from their heart, from their soul, but its hard because you want your elders, people who have experienced more, to speak. So you your either silent or you stumble through your words, and its just its harder than I thought…I’ve struggled a lot just to get ‘here’ and I don’t even know where ‘here’ is.

In the past year I’ve given up my home, my family so I can be here and it was a fluke that I got to join this discussion and to be with the incredible people who have fought for our right to be here and to learn from our elders and all our teachers and mentors.  And it’s a gift that we’ve been able to stand here, but it comes with a difficulty it seems, because you don’t know how to contribute to the discussion that others have been in for years. It’s a divide between those who are joining, and those who have been here, and I can’t imagine what its like for them, because they’ve been waiting years to speak. I’ve just joined but I’ve been trying to speak since the beginning.”

Jesse Wabegijik The Study Student Participant

Jessie’s admission was a personally meaningful moment for me during the course of The Study/The Repast. There were many witnesses to his 90-minute struggle to find an opening for his voice at the table. And it was most poignant to watch respected Elder among artists and one of our ‘grandmothers’ Margo Kane take the honourable step of addressing it:

“There are a number of people who sit at this table and there is no space for them to speak. So I am concerned about that, and I would really like to hear from the people that have been here for a while, and ensure that we leave room for them to speak as well”.

This moment has stuck with me since. It is a metaphor of the reality of Indigenous peoples in Canada. We have been here since the beginning, constantly trying to find our seat at the table, yearning to have our voices heard because we have something to say.

joe fire
In foreground: Joseph Osawabine To his right: Monique Mojica and Corey Payette

During The Study the U.N released its report on Canada’s treatment of Aboriginal people highlighting the ‘crisis’ for our basic human rights. When I shared the news of the report with the participants, nobody seemed overtly surprised by the results: distressing socio-economic conditions, inadequate funding, over representation of Indigenous peoples in prisons, high rates of violence, missing and murdered women, exclusion of Indigenous peoples from effective participation in decisions that affect their lives. After all – we had just spent the week reading plays and discussing these very issues. Art reflects life, reflects art.

The day the study ended here on Manitoulin Island, an incident took place that reminded me of the reality of the ‘crisis’ in our communities and why the work we do is important. On Sunday, community members were lounging around outside the Holy Cross Mission Church, waiting for the Bishop to arrive to perform the Sacrament of Confirmation. In the murmur of the crowd, people were casually discussing a murder/homicide that took place Saturday night in the community. In an instant, we lost 4 young community members, the young man who lost his life and the three who will probably spend the rest of their lives in jail.

There is just something about all these juxtapositions that is twisting in my mind and heart and soul. On one hand, we have this historic gathering that I was still coming down from, and on the other hand, the horrific reminder of the truth of our reality that I may never get up from – mixed in with the ceremonial activities of the of the day and the arrival of the Bishop.

At the Summit, we are filled with inspiration as artists, creators, writers and educators, who have an enormous responsibility to move forward with as much in our bundle that was left for us that we can – and share it among our children and youth. Our strengths are regained, re-imagined, relived – by telling and hearing our stories. They tell us of our epic struggles overcome by unconditional love, our courage to overcome in the face of impossible odds; our respect for everything that lives, watches over us and dwells below us and our role, living precariously in between the two. We have been telling our stories since time immemorial.

2015-05-11 20.37.47
From left: Justin Many Fingers and Joseph Osawabine

As Canadians, it is no longer enough to explore and critique the art and expression of Indigenous people, while remaining ignorant of the multi-generational and systemic complicity in their life outcomes. We are at the dawn of a new frontier in our relationship and one that is filled with possibility. If we have the courage to use it wisely, we can change the path we have been on.

At Debajehmujig-Storytellers, we are dedicated to improving the quality of life for the Indigenous people of this land through the preservation and the telling of our stories. We are guided by our traditional teachings, which tell us that we are born with a purpose and a mission. We are uniquely gifted to be able to fulfill our purpose and we must each understand our relationship to the teachings, so that we become the best ancestors that we possibly can for “The Preservation of Humanity”. Every one of us needs to contribute in our own way.

The stories that come from this land must be told by the people of this land if we are to truly understand one another. As Indigenous people, we bring awareness to all Canadians – that there is and always has been, another way to experience and view the world. A worldview that has emerged out of our relationship to this land, to these animals, under these stars. We need places where Indigeneity can thrive in its most organic forms, free of settler narratives and directly connected to its foundations in our cultural history and in our geography.

From this foundation of clarity, a truly equitable sharing with other Canadians will offer each of us the opportunity to up-level our vision to include the richness of the other.

 

 

 

Claiming Space at the Table

cole rez sis
From left: Joelle Peters, Brefny Caribou-Curtin, Jillian Keiley, Carly Chamberlain, Quelemia Sparrow, Darla Contois, Jani Lauzon, Margo Kane and Monique Mojica

My name is Cole Alvis and I am proud of my Métis heritage from the Turtle Mountains in Manitobah. As the Executive Director of the national arts service organization Indigenous Performing Arts Alliance (IPAA), it was exciting to be invited into a process led by Associate Artistic Director Sarah Garton Stanley of the National Arts Centre (NAC) English Theatre. For two years Sarah and Past-IPAA Board President Yvette Nolan were co-curators of the The Cycle, an NAC initiative that has shined its spotlight on performance Indigenous to this land. IPAA’s collaboration began leading up to The Summit in Banff (April 2014) culminating in The Study / Repast (May 2015).

Although many are hearing about us for the first time, IPAA celebrated ten years as a federally incorporated not-for-profit on March 16th, 2015. Our organizational ancestry extends far beyond this present form. Community held ad hoc gatherings began as early as 1990 with the event Telling Our Own Story: Appropriation and Indigenous Performing Artists. The urgency to tell our story remains, and it is essential as we navigate another wave of non-Native allies eager to collaborate with Indigenous artists and stories inspired by the Canada Council for the Arts’ new project grant {Re}conciliation.

FullSizeRender
The Commitments Bundle

One such ally is the NAC. Former Artistic Director Peter Hinton recognized the importance of this bond and sought to include an Indigenous play in every season. This iteration of collaboration between the NAC and IPAA began with Sarah and Yvette strategizing how to usurp the hierarchy present in national partnerships by creating a unique structure for our initial gathering at The Summit where the Indigenous artists were the Leaders and the non-Native artistic directors were the Listeners. This intimate approach in Banff became broader in scope at The Study / Repast. Over forty Indigenous performing artists came through the Debajehmujig Creation Centre between May 5th and 16th and in the final days of The Repast artistic leaders joined us from coast to coast to coast.

The Study / Repast was an opportunity to dig deeper into the roots of Indigenous theatre in Canada by bringing Indigenous theatre students and recent graduates together with a professional acting company and other seasoned Indigenous performing artists, including Monique Mojica, Daniel David Moses, and Muriel Miguel. These artists were often present during the creation and production processes of the work we were exploring, and so could offer insight into the rumblings of Indigenous theatre.

Leading up to The Repast we read plays. Sometimes more than five a day! Starting with Tomson Highway, we headed out of Wikwemikong Unceded Reserve on Highway 69 for a big game of bingo (The Rez Sisters), and then onto more recent Indigenous performance presently touring across Turtle Island.

We explored these works together at Debajehmujig Storyteller’s Creation Centre and The Ruins. Artistic Director Joe Osawabine welcomed us to Odawa territory and made us feel at home. He provided teachings, ensured that we were well fed, and accompanied us on a hike to Dreamer’s Rock. Joe was in his element. Throughout our time at the Creation Centre, Joe was also supporting local filmmaker Matthew Manitowabi as he helped us document The Study / Repast, ensuring that those who could not join us physically on Manitoulin Island could still experience the work and the conversation through video. Joe and Matthew are now editing the incredible footage and artist interviews in the editing suite at the Debajehmujig Creation Centre – stay tuned to www.ipaa.ca for our videos!

The base of Dreamer’s Rock

The first day of the Repast was called the Day of Listening and saw the structure from the Summit be expanded into a conversation for four Indigenous leaders in front of a live audience and also streamed live on the internet. Four chairs were placed in the centre of the performance space facing inwards, allowing the participants to focus on one other. These conversations alternated between bursts of performance throughout the day and evolved without facilitation. The final day was the Day of Speaking and we employed a conversational structure created by the co-founder of Spiderwoman Theatre, a non-Native woman named Lois Weaver. Our community is more accustomed to circles and it was fascinating to see us take care of each other while respecting the etiquette within this structure.

Justin Many Fingers and Waawaate Fobister expressed the missed opportunity to include the work and stories of 2-Spirited people during The Study / Repast. (You can see Waawaate introducing this topic on the Day 3 web stream at 1 hour, 4 minutes and 30 secs.) Their ability to speak generously about this exclusion reminded me we all have blind spots that require our diligence and care.

Another systemic barrier is the disconnect between rural and urban Indigenous communities. Student Acting Company member Jesse Wabegijig beautifully addressed this divide with his extended presence at the Long Table. He was among the first to sit down at the beginning and found it challenging to navigate his place within the prescribed etiquette. You can hear him speak of that experience shortly after Margo Kane prompts him to share in the Day 3 web stream at 2 hours, 11 minutes and 5 seconds. The image of him with his head in his hands stays with me highlighting the huge responsibility I have when I speak as the leader of the Indigenous Performing Arts Alliance. It is a privilege to be able to address national funders, touring bodies and other groups of people on behalf of our membership and Jesse’s words of listening to Elders and community combined with his perseverance to express himself is an inspiration.

Joe Osawabine presented IPAA with a bundle containing people’s personal commitments and contributions to the future, past and present of the Indigenous Body of Work. We are proud to be the keeper of these commitments and this bundle.

In my closing speech I made a commitment to think critically about who is not at the table. I would like to further that pledge by addressing the systemic barriers that make it difficult for members of our community like Jesse Wabegijig to participate in the conversation.

Thanks! / Marsi for listening!

Cole Alvis
Executive Director
Indigenous Performing Arts Alliance www.ipaa.ca

A personal realization about programming Indigenous work

2015-05-14 16.14.14
From left in foreground: Herbie Barnes and Tara Beagan Repast Design Andy Moro

Three years ago I took the helm of the English Theatre at the NAC. To say it’s been a steep learning curve is a laughable understatement. The learning is not just about how to run a large company or about the depth and breadth of theatre in Canada. It is about learning what the Canadian Story is, and how we are choosing to tell it.

I inherited the job from Peter Hinton. Peter did a huge job to ensure a presence on that national stage of Indigenous artists. Back then, I told Peter I was committed to continuing what he had started and ensuring that there was always an Indigenous presence in the programming. It seemed like a righteous thing to do – First Nations artists have seen oppression, they have seen racism, they get pigeonholed, and it is generally recognized that it’s hard for any persons who are not considered Caucasian to get roles in classical works. I could see all that. I was going to follow Peter’s path and help by offering opportunities to Indigenous artists.

It wasn’t a problem to do it practically. Many Indigenous artists are at the top of their craft and I would have asked them into the ensemble, or put shows like huff in the season, whether I had made that commitment or not. But that doesn’t mean I knew what I was talking about. My desire to make that commitment was steeped in being correct. Not steeped in an understanding of WHY we needed to do it. My understanding of Canada was not clear enough to know that I wasn’t doing a righteous thing to have Indigenous work in the season, but an absolutely essential thing.

The first thing I said to Sarah Stanley who joined me as Associate Artistic Director at the NAC was that I felt absolutely unqualified to carry through on that torch-relay from Peter. I knew nothing really about Indigenous storytelling. I knew about some good actors, but I only knew about three playwrights who were telling Indigenous stories. I asked Sarah to put together an intensive study of the canon of First Nations, Inuit and Metis work in Canada. We would celebrate the work and other artistic directors could come and we would all learn from it and extend that righteous programming across the country. If my learning curve coming to the NAC was a steep, attending The Study of the body of Indigenous work in Canada for two weeks on Manitoulin Island was a full 90 degrees.

I learned and learned and learned and learned and changed. I am actually changed by it. I can’t say that very often but I’m sitting here weeping while I’m writing these words, so it must be true. I only cry when I am being changed these days, just like a dunch arsed youngster.

I heard play after play about the current outrage of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls, play after play about residential schools, play after play about abducted Indigenous children who were taken from their families and put in foster care. Parents who have a hard time parenting because they themselves were stolen and never learned parenting. It hurt my soul to hear it. Shameful things have happened in our country. Harper himself read the apology for it. We cannot deny that it happened. And yet, I looked on the CBC website while I was there and there were two more Indigenous young women missing and the results of the inquest about the death of a First Nations teen who had been in care of the government.

The comments section were full of people saying that it’s a “Native problem;” that “alcoholism is something to fix in their own society;” and the most hurtful of all, “another proof that the Natives don’t love their children.” The next day I came back to the play readings and heard story after story of decades and decades of government workers, priests and nuns taking children. Institutions abducting them, beating them, sexually abusing them. Taking their language, culture and religion. Desperate parents chasing a car full of their own kids down barren roadways.

I had heard this history, but until I heard the stories and was moved by those stories, I did not know the history.

2015-05-15 11.52.25
Margo Kane reading from Moonlodge. Repast design Andy Moro

I’ve never had the power to physically punch out. I dropped out of debating club because I got called Olive Oyl at a tournament. I wish I was a fighter but I’m not. But we, you and I in the theatre, in TV and in film – WE have the power to teach. We have the power to reach people.

These are not all sad plays. The darker ones resonate with resilience more than tragedy. Most of them are funny. Some of them are really really funny. I had a long talk with a playwright I admire who insisted that none of his plays dealt with that dark history, that his were comedies celebrating First Nations humour. And he’s right. They are funny. But reflecting on his work, he can’t avoid the circumstance of what his characters have seen. Their history. Our history.

I blindly accepted Peter Hinton’s lead in programming Indigenous work because I believed it was righteous. But if I am going to tell Canada’s story through the theatre, this is the longest, most dramatic episode in our history. And we are still in it. I’m not doing anyone a favour by telling it. I have been granted the privilege to know about a community of artists who can bring that incredible, important story of our history and aspect of our society to our audiences. And our audiences need to hear that story, not just the history but the stories, so that together, we can move forward.

After recognizing that artistic directors often say that they would like to program Indigenous work but don’t know how or don’t know what the plays are, the Indigenous Performing Arts Alliance (IPAA) created a list of close to 400 plays by Indigenous writers. There is also a new First Nations Talent Bank for those wishing to engage an actor who can bring an Indigenous perspective to the work you are doing. The SpiderWebMap in tandem with theatrewiki.ca encourages Indigenous artists to locate themselves and their stories on the map. In fact I encourage all theatre makers to locate themselves there.

Indigenous artists are not so small in number and together we have the power to bring a fuller story of Canada to our stages.

Thanks

Jill

#CdnCult Times; Volume 5, Edition 3

Welcome to the #StudyRepast Edition. In brief, from May 5-16 Debajehmujig Storytellers, IPAA and NAC English Theatre, collaborated on a project dedicated to exploring and celebrating the Indigenous Body of Work. Salient among the many emerging themes were: the weight, import and brilliance of the stories, and what it means to open a door and to keep it open. I co-edited this issue with Editor-In Chief Michael Wheeler. He asked me to write this note because I had a clear idea for this edition and because I was there. Michael and I co-created SpiderWebShow to be able to respond quickly and forcefully to the events that shape our performance ecology and we want #CdnCult to act as the digital record of these times.

I want our country to understand itself. Theatre and Live Art are the tools our #CdnCult readership collectively employ. A literary manager brings to the attention of the artistic director and producer the plays that want to be produced. Thinking about this nationally, I encourage all of us to think like literary managers, and for the well being of our shared futures to advocate for the stories that -first and foremost – underpin who we are. To say what happens on the Rez stays on the Rez is like trying to run in quick sand. You can do it, for awhile, but eventually you just might drown. We need to learn how to run on this land, we need the full knowledge to know how this land works, we need the whole body and we need to own up to the full story. New stories are great, but as storytellers, we need to know our past before we can tell fully realized stories about our collective futures.

Each of the contributors speak to these ideas. Each speaks personally, but they are able do so because each of their companies were part of this historic collaboration. Jillian Keiley comes to a personal revelation regarding our need for story, Joseph Osawabine’s gives voice to the hard core realities of maintaining an Indigenous life in a country that does not uphold Indigenous values and Cole Alvis walks us through The #StudyRepast and leaves us with a personal recommitment to surveying who is and is not at “the table”.

Click here for more information about the whole cycle that includes The Summit at Banff in April 2014 and the #StudyRepast at Debajehmujig Storytellers on Manitoulin Island in May 2015.

Sarah Garton Stanley
SpiderWebShow Artistic Director
Co-Curator Summit/Study/Repast

Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu

ii-2

Pièce : Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu || Dramaturge : Réjean Ducharme
Lieu : Pointe St Charles || Modèles : Michelle Creeley, Phil Malizia

INAT TENDU : Liberté!… Liberté chérie ! moi penser assez vite pour voir en même temps tout ce que tu me redonnes ! Me revoici, tout d’un coup repeuplé ! Les fossés et les ponts, les forêts et les villes se sont remis à me loger ! Liberté, mon amour, mon chou, debout !

L’oeuvre dramatique Ines Pérée et Intat Tendu de Réjean Ducharme a été éditée à l’occasion de sa présentation au Théâtre de Gésu en 1976 par la Nouvelle Compagnie Théâtrale.

What Exactly is a Shared Platform?

brainstorm photo
We held an Open Source Brainstorm in the Theatre Centre Incubator as part of developing a plan for STAF’s new Shared Platform.

Eight months ago I took over as Executive Director and Transformation Designer of Small Theatre Administrative Facility (STAF). From that moment, I have been swept up in a conversation about ‘Shared Platforms’, a term at the centre of discussions on how to evolve our cultural infrastructure. Shared platform is also just a descriptor that can refer to many different models, which I think is leading to some confusion as people think about the possibilities they present.

STAF is a shared platform and is a good place to start this conversation as it is transitioning from one type of shared platform to a new one. In the old model (started just weeks after The Blue Jays first won the World Series in 1992) STAF was a shared platform for subsidized administrative services. The model allowed a number of artists and companies to share a grant writer, publicist, financial administrator, or general manager, thus reducing the administrative cost to those artists.

I am not a fan on this type of shared platform, as is probably obvious from my job title. Although it was once a very good idea, times have changed and as a community we must adapt to the given circumstances.  We will announce in early June some of the specifics of the different type of shared platform STAF is creating. These measures will give artists greater agency to follow the advice Mike Daisey tweeted to artists while in Toronto to, “own the means of production. Always.”

This means a shared platform that gives artists many more chances to do this type of work for themselves, and fewer chances to pay someone to do it for them. The word ‘entrepreneurial’ is often applied to this type of shared platform, but we will also have programs that seek a living wage. If nothing else, it is a healthier model that allows the ideals of Marx and Adam Smith to co-exist.

These are not the only types of shared platforms, and another kind has been discussed at length and is getting significant attention from funders: This week TAC, OAC, Trillium and Metcalf put out a call for “expressions of interest” regarding “shared charitable platform work”. This is the culmination of significant research and discussion around the how to deal with the infrastructure and requirements for emerging and newer artists as the RFEOI states:

“Many now question the feasibility of requiring artists to incorporate as stand-alone organizations in order to receive public and private funding, and seek alternative models to sustain their practice. One of the alternatives that has been proposed to address this challenge is shared charitable platforms.”

It also cites from the Metcalf-funded paper by Jane Marsland “Shared Platforms and Charitable Venture Organizations (2013)”, which was when I first became aware of shared platforms as a solution to barriers that many independent organizations face:

  1. It takes considerable work and expense to incorporate and set up a not-for-profit corporation with a Board of Directors.
  2. That Board of Directors can fire you from your job running the theatre company you started.
  3. The ability to give out tax receipts and receive funding from foundations requires a second more onerous level of administration along with being a not-for-profit corporation to maintain charitable status.
  4. With limited opportunities and many emerging artists, there is a trend of new and emerging artists spending their energy (in between bartending and commercial auditions) to set up this bulky infrastructure in order to have the means to pursue their craft.
  5. Registered charities have strict rules on their ability to engage in political advocacy. Recently we have seen with many environmental groups targeted by CRA regarding this aspect of the law.

*This is something we have talked about more at Praxis Theatre than something I have seen discussed in cultural industry studies or literature.

Marsland’s study, which acknowledges significant input on the nature of Canadian tax law from the David Stevens and Margaret Mason paper, “Tides Canada Initiatives Society: Charitable Venture Organizations: A New Infrastructure Model for Canadian Registered Charities“, outlines three possible umbrella models that could serve to lessen the need for emerging and new artists to go this route.

  • A) Establish a Charitable Venture Organization specifically for arts organizations.
  • B) Utilize existing administrative platforms such as arts service organizations or arts management providers.
  • C) Existing arts organizations, in collaborative relationships, acting as shared platforms.

A primary takeaway here from the report is:

“A charity must be able to show that in fact, at all times, it is carrying out only its own activities through the intermediary, and that it directs and controls the use of any resources that further these activities.”

The only reasonable conclusion I can reach from this is Option A: Charitable Venture Organization (CVO) is the type of shared platform that would best meet the standards established by Revenue Canada. Marsland lists several core characteristics of a CVO:

  • Project belongs to the CVO — the CVO takes the project in-house and it is not a separate legal entity
  • CVO is liable for everything
  • Project personnel are employees of the CVO
  • Contributions belong to the CVO — CVO reports revenue, expenses

Basically by ‘owning’ the project and being responsible for the finances, a CVO could provide charitable status for a number of projects and artists who no longer have to set up companies and boards and annual audited statements. Sounds like a good idea in principle, which is why there is now real talk about putting money behind setting one up. STAF Board President Julie Tepperman and her company Convergence Theatre is listed as a case study in the report where she notes:

“We certainly do not want a board who can hire and fire us. Nor do we want the headache of all the extra reporting and accounting. We do not want to have to pay $3,000 a year, which we don’t have, to do our taxes. We have enough headaches and accountability doing our taxes as a “shared partnership” thank you very much! The last thing we want or need is to turn Convergence Theatre into a child who will always need nurturing and care.”

FullSizeRender-2
The RIser Project was front page news in METRO yesterday.

Of course these aren’t the only shared platform models out there. Why Not Theatre has also created a shared platform for The Riser Project , which brings mid-sized theatre organizations into the creative process with emerging artists as their works are created and presented, providing artistic and producing opportunities these companies could only achieve collectively. The Metcalf Foundation and Toronto Arts Foundation recently committed to funding a two-year research and evaluation study of Why Not’s shared platform as well as STAF’s new model by S.L. Helwig & Associates President and Principal Consultant Sherri Helwig.

The hope is this will provide feedback to the community and to funders about how these particular shared platforms worked and where they can be improved. If there is consensus on anything about Shared Platforms, it is that there are many different models and that we need to be rigorous in our assessment of best practices while maintaining willingness for disparate models to co-exist.

Theatre by the Numbers

222695480_726bebd8f5_o
Photo by Darren Barefoot via Creative Commons 2.0

This year, the Professional Association of Canadian Theatres (PACT) undertook a big push for a celebration of World Theatre Day (March 27), with a Canadian message co-commissioned with Playwrights Guild of Canada and the Association des théâtres francophones du Canada – ATFC from theatre artist Mieko Ouchi. As the new Executive Director of PACT, I am heavily committed to the sharing of my passion for theatre with the general public and was so excited to have World Theatre Day Canada trend in social media!

Extra thrilling to me was that StatsCanada produced a Theatre by the Numbers piece about theatre in Canada – I even called to thank them. (Interestingly enough, the numbers included sales of cosmetics and wigs as relevant data). Hill Strategies recently promoted this information as part of an overall Arts Research Monitor, together with the data garnered as part of a PACT commissioned survey by Nanos Research last spring and Jane Marsland’s very interesting Changing Landscape for Theatres.

Certainly, in advocating for the significance of the arts in Canada, numbers are often the thing – from numbers of attendees to the Canadian cultural spend or the GDP of the performing arts in Canada. (See Simon Brault’s blog “Art if a Serious Business”) But with these numbers, what do we actually know about Canadian theatre? Finding comprehensive and statistically valid data (please, contain your excitement) is almost impossible. The StatsCan information comes from formal reporting in HST, CRA payroll remittances and charitable information returns – but what about the information that is captured elsewhere, in CADAC for companies receiving operating funding from the granting agencies that use the financial and statistical reporting web application?

But, CADAC is self-entered and with the exception of the financials – which must match audit data – prone to inconsistency, over-aggregation and some (perhaps) inflation by the organizations who use it. And there are many theatre companies, on project grants or outside the incorporated/charitable paradigm, who are not represented at all. Fringe anyone?

When I moved to PACT as the new Executive Director last September, I wanted to know who, if anyone, knew how many professional theatre companies there were in Canada? I mean, Anglophone, Francophone, Aboriginal, diverse, large, tiny, venue-based, fringe-based, and informal collectives. And do you know, no one knows. There are 295 who receive operating funding identified in CADAC. PACT certainly collects information about around 400 or so in its Theatre Listing, but keeping it up to date is constant work and every six months a new revision is essential. I called Jane Marsland to see if she had any ideas about it. She agreed; no one has the big picture.

Every year, hundreds of theatre productions happen across Canada, mounted by PACT member and other professional companies, touring productions, Fringe shows, independent productions in store front theatres and pop-up venues. (I can’t even begin to conceive of the number of community and amateur performances.) So there must be thousands of individual performances. And, given the limitations of our data collection and the underfunded nature of the sector, we simply lose the information. Whole seasons of theatre are lost (unless you are a company that can afford to keep archive pages on your website), except for random hits in Google searches. For me it is heartbreaking.

True, one of the exciting things about live theatre as an art form is its very ephemeral nature. Miss that show and the one the next night will be different again, miss the production and you may regret it – many Canadian shows that are worth a second or third run or a national tour simply disappear. I truly regret having a headache and missing not being able to make Vitals by Rosamund Small in 2014. I had read the script and was really excited. But a migraine… wait, I have gotten off topic….

What would we do with valid data about Canadian theatre? We certainly use what we have in advocacy work – explaining to elected officials and senior public servants that indeed, Canadians go to theatre, and spend so much, and volunteer so much, and stable funding can extend not only the intrinsic value of the work but also the economic benefits. But wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could say, on this night in 2014 there were so many performances with potential audiences of this many thousands of people (I think capturing actual attendance would be unfeasible but we could count seats). That there were this many plays by this many playwrights, how many were women, how many artists of colour…oh, the things we could learn!

What to do with it? More effective government advocacy certainly. But what about quarterly or monthly press releases celebrating the number or an online searchable database of productions – statistical information could go out to international media (why keep that kind of information to ourselves?), generating attention for the volume and diversity of work that is clearly not captured in the ever-decreasing space allotted to theatre in regular media in Canada. Theatre tourism in Canada – book your trip on VIA and explore the theatre and the geography of Canada!

When Kelly Nestruck reposts (again) his 2009 article about the pathetic-ness of World Theatre Day, I want to have the numbers to celebrate. To prove that we are championing a form that is experienced, loved and sought out by more people than are captured by StatsCanada or CADAC? That employs so many people. That (if we even knew) is even bigger than the $1.4 billion dollars we spend on live performing arts according to a recent CAPACOA study. To prove that we are not whistling in the dark.

Now, I recognize that in addition to having a passion for live theatre, I have become a bit of a data nerd. But seriously, what would we do with the information if we had the big picture about Canadian theatre?

(And I haven’t even mentioned how we no longer have detail about our audiences – demographically, psycho-graphically – unless you are large enough for a major software solution that… wait, I think that is another 1,000 words entirely…)