Living a Digital Connection: Reflecting on The Revolutions

Living a Digital Connection: Reflecting on The Revolutions

SHARE
Artists in Kingston, Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver in The Revolutions. Photo by Mariah Horner.

I recently signed on as an actor in SpiderWebShow’s The Revolutions, to help a passionate collection of thinkers, technical wizards and artists test a prototype for a new, digital, theatre delivery system.

Their long-term goal, it seems to me, is to enable actors in various, separate locations to play together, “live”, in front of live audiences. Given the current, mind-boggling pace of technological development, this dream may be ready for prime time sooner than one might think.

The play at the centre of the project, The Revolutions, by Rhiannon Collett, was performed, simultaneously, by six actors located in four cities (Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal and Kingston).

While the three actors in Kingston were physically present in front of the live audience, the other three actors and their performances were delivered to Kingston via internet, projected on a single screen. At certain magical moments it appeared that all actors existed together in the same place at the same time. Throughout, audiences were able to choose to view the goings-on of the life-sized actors actually in front of them, or experience all six blended together on the big screen.

Imagine a theatre where actors and spectators from a dozen—a hundred—a thousand—different places around the world are brought together in one place without actually needing, physically, to be there. Suppose they can look each other in the eye, listen, speak to one another, breathe and play together. All live, all in real time, all in three dimensions. Eventually, given enough data, participants at such gatherings might even be able to touch, taste, smell each other.

Jim Garrard and Anne Hardcastle in Kingston. Photo by Mariah Horner.

Based on my experience on the project, I believe this is the kind of theatre environment these artists are aiming for. Already, they can magically combine two-dimensional, moving images of actors and audiences in separate cities, making it appear as though they are all together in the same physical space.

For the present, however, this new use of technology cannot make the fundamental living connection between actor and actor, actor and audience that theatre depends upon. It’s not yet possible for actors to look at each other, bounce off each other, feel the audience breathe and be moved as one. It’s not yet possible for this technology to deliver live theatrical content as plausibly as actors can to an audience assembled around a campfire or pageant wagon; in a park, town square or purpose-built theatre; or storefront, historic site, elevator, moving train or subway car—for example.

To me, “theatre” signifies both an art form that specializes in narrative content (story) and the physical space in which the art is presented live to an audience (place).

In the case of The Revolutions, the play/story/content is relatively straight-forward. As worthy as it is, it would fit comfortably in a traditional theatre space. As would the actors’ performances.

What is potentially marvelous and revolutionary here is the nature of the theatre space/place/delivery system that SpiderWebShow envisions. However, if and when this new playpen in cyberspace becomes fully functional, what effect will it have on the stories human beings seem to need to tell each other face-to-face? What adverse, unintended consequences might there be?

Invention of the axe meant raised stages: more people could see the actors. Electricity meant more people could hear them, still see them after dark. Film meant exchanging theatrical immediacy for portability in time and space. “Live” television restored immediacy, but replaced storytelling with journalism, spectacle and games.

Artists in Kingston, Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal digitally performing in The Revolutions. Photo by Mariah Horner.

Over the centuries, in the face of developing technologies, the essential nature of stories hasn’t changed much—heroes and villains; beginning, middle, end; conflict, suspense, surprise; rising action, climax, resolution; order restored, lesson learned; and so forth. Changes in the social order have made the stories we tell less about kings and queens, more about ordinary humans; but, the fundamentals haven’t changed.

Artists are restless creatures, impulsively responsive to the changing world around them. They don’t want to sit forever, telling stories around some tribal campfire. Immutable story elements, solidly rooted—as they are—in human nature, can be seen as barriers to invention. It can be more fun to tinker with the medium than to imagine new stories to be told in old ways.

Right now, the world is overwhelmed and obsessed with digital technologies. There is barely an obstacle in the way of any actor wishing to communicate instantly in “real time” with any other willing spectator in the world.

One danger is, that altered media and new technologies often thrive best on trivial content. Ancient myths and enduring archetypes get shunted aside in favour of ersatz opinion, topical issues, gossip, viral misinformation, anonymous malice, contempt for art and grace. Authentic shared experience disappears into the cybersphere.

Authentic stories—especially those imagined and told by artists—connect us. Such stories nourish the human soul, place it in a universe of time and space. If artists are tempted to invent new media to tell stories, let them be sure story and art don’t get lost in the process.

Comments

comments

SHARE
Previous articlePodcast: Creating in CdnStudio
Next articleThought Residency: Michael Wheeler

About the Author

retro

Born in Englehart, Ontario, Jim is a graduate of Toronto Teachers’ College, Queen’s University at Kingston, London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art (LAMDA), Rochdale College and Canadian Film Centre. He has served as Artist-In-Residence at University of Toronto, Simon Fraser University, Montreal’s Centaur Theatre and Rochdale College. Also, Chair of Video Caberet International, Chair of Canada Council Explorations Jury, founding artistic director of Theatre Passe Muraille and SALON Theatre, artistic director of Kingston Summer Festival at The grand Theatre. Jim was Theatre and Dance Consultant for the Province of Ontario, Executive Director of Toronto Arts Council, and Marketing Director for Kingston Summer Festival. As an actor, Jim has appeared at Tarragon Theatre, Theatre Passe Muraille and the legendary Theatre Second Floor. He has directed at Theatre Passe Muraille, 25th Street House Theatre in Saskatoon, Bristol Old Vic, the Grand Theatre, University of Ottawa and for Salon Theatre. Jim is best known as a playwright. His Bondage Plays for My Country include DEAD HEAT, GETTING EVEN, COLD COMFORT, SPENCER’S MOM and BIG TICKET. Other plays include PEGGY’S SONG, FOURTEEN, SIR JOHN, EH? (with Grant Heckman) and DEEP WATER DREAMS–a play about the life of Florence Nightingale. Norstar Entertainment’s feature film, ‘Cold Comfort’, was based on Jim’s play. He wrote and directed the short film, ‘Touch My Lips’, which has played at festivals around the world. Jim is a member of WGC and Playwrights Union of Canada. He is a recipient of numerous Canada Council Awards and received a Harold Award in 2003.